Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, Angart 2002 <br /><:30o*dodipjn. <br />Smith once ogain asked if the Commission were wUling to give a Utde bit on the square fooUge. <br />Mabusth stated that the original home had 660 s.f of hardcover and felt it justified to hold the <br />new residence to that figure, yet she stressed how important it was to maintain the 53’ setback. <br />Smith asked if this meant up to the 50’ DNR recommendation. <br />Fiitelcr and Bremer sUted that they would adhere to the approved 53 ’ and no less. <br />Mabusth stated that she would like to know how deep the proposed overhang would be. <br />Rahn stated that he could support the 50’ setback. <br />Ms. Welch asked the Commission to set the parameters for her and she would take them back U <br />Mr. Welch to redesign and meet those. <br />Mabusth reiterated that the applicant not exceed the 660 s.f and maintain a 50’ setback, and <br />asked her to have the surveyor mark the eave depth and distance from the lake on the survey the <br />next time around. <br />Ms. Welch felt she had enough to go on. <br />Rahn still questioned the overhang status. <br />Mabusth pointed out that if a structure meets setback, it is a legal nonencroachment if the eaves <br />overhang 1 1/2’; however, since this structure does not fidl within the legal setback of 75’, the <br />overhartgs are counted into the equatioit <br />SnMk moved, fHtikr Kcomicd, to tebk AppUcodoa dW-MIJ, Merit Wckk, 305 Norik <br />Skoro Drive, to allow ttooppUcoat time for redc$l|o|miposct. VOTE: Ayco 5, Noyt 0. <br />PAGE 21 <br />I