Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />i <br />in many cases is not adequate to properly maneuver in and out of a garage. The concept of <br />shifting the driveway to the north or adding a backout area beyond the existing driveway is not <br />possible due to the extreme slope of the hill leading up to North Shore Drive. Also any changes <br />to the driveway and/or addition of a backout area for vehicles would require removal of part of <br />the hillside that supports the County Road and construction of a retaining wail system. The City <br />would liave further concerns with the land alteration and retaining wails since it would require <br />additional hardcover on the property. <br />F. The passable portion of the driveway is further reduced by any parking that would be <br />located on the north side of the house. Assuming a standard 9 ’ parking width the total available <br />passing distance remaining would be 10 ’ if the house is located further to the north. <br />G. The Planning Commission was supportive of any plan that would result in the house not <br />encroaching further into the driveway than the existing house and not within SO’ of the lakeshore. <br />Both conditions could be met by removing the roof overhang from the lakeside of the house and <br />reducing the prow to 4’ rather than 4.S*. <br />Public Comments <br />The adjacent property owner to the west (3635 North Shore Drive) appeared at the August 19, <br />2002 hearing and stated he would be supportive of the variances as presented that evening if the <br />existing arborvitae privacy hedge that exists between the two residences remained. <br />Additional Staff Findings <br />Since the Planning Commission meeting the City Fire Marshal was requested to provide <br />standards for driveways for emergency vehicle access. The Fire Marshal stated the Uniform Fire <br />Code (1997) requires access roads, including this driveway, meet a minimum accessible width of <br />20 ’. The current width of parts of this shared driveway is less than 20 ’. The driveway does get <br />wider when it reaches the applicant’s property and the properties further west. <br />The Fire Marshal stated the local Fire Chief can be requested to reduce the standards under <br />certain conditions. Generally, the standards can be adjust^ when each building is provided with <br />sprinkling systems and/or adequate hydrant locations are nvailable. [The houses on the private <br />driveway are mostly old cabins that have been converted to year round homes. None have <br />sprinkler systems. The properties are QQt served with municipal water, therefore there are no <br />hydrants available. The water to fight a fire must be transported to the property by individual <br />tankers.) <br />The property is located in the Long Lake service area. The Long Lake Fire Dept, has been <br />contacted to comment on the proposed building plan. No comments have been made available to <br />the City as of the date of this memo. Those comments may be a ailable by the Council meeting <br />of September 23"*. <br />The driveway serves as a private roadway. Private roadways serving 7 or fewer units in the City <br />require a roadway width of 24 ’. This roadway is 22 ’ wide or less for the entire length. A 22 ’ <br />roadway can serve adequately for this neighborhood but 16’ is Qst wide enough for a private road <br />with parking. <br />•2113 Mark Welch <br />3623 North Shore Drive <br />Pagc3or4