My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
10-14-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:18:24 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:50:00 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Based on the locations of the existing pipes under the railroad tracks and Crystal Bay Road the most <br />logical location for stormwater ponding is on the western side of this area in the vicinity of .3435, <br />3445, and 3447 Crystal Bay Road. A review of the property value information, and the occupancy <br />status of thf properties shows that these three properties are the lower value properties in the area <br />and one of the houses is vacant. This vacant house is in very poor condition, is probably not worth <br />remodeling, and will most likely be demolished and a new house built on this property. <br />The property adjacent to the pipe under the railroad tracks is the lowest valued property w ith a very <br />small house on it. However, this house is currently occupied and is in good condition. I have talked <br />to the property owner about his possible interest in selling his property to the City to use for <br />stormwater ponding purposes. He is not interested in selling his property. The valuation for tax <br />purposes is only $58,000, but he just turned down an offer of $150,000 for the sale of his property. <br />He has evaluated the replacement housing that is available near Lake Minnetonka, and there is not <br />anything with a comparable location that is affordable for the money he could get selling his <br />property. He likes his location, close to the lake, with the railroad embankment adjacent *o his <br />property as it is a rather wooded and secluded site. His long term plan is to expand the house and <br />continue to live on the property. He would like to see a stormwater pond located on the property at <br />3445 Cry stal Bay Road which currently has a vacant house on it. <br />We have also discussed the possibility of acquisition of the property, located at 3435 Crystal Bay <br />Road with the property owner, and he is also not interested in selling his property, as he enjoys the <br />location on the lake and wants to continue to live on the property. The house on this property is in <br />reasonably good shape. He also suggested the possibility of a pond on the property with the vacant <br />house. This vacant house is in a dilapidated condition and the neighbors would like to see this house <br />removed as soon as possible. They understand that there are issues with the lakeshore ownership <br />that has put the application process on hold for the possible redevelopment of this property, but they <br />do not want to wait for these issues to be resolved before the existing vacant house is removed. We <br />are currently evaluating the condition of the vacant house for hazardous building issues. The Police <br />Depa.tment has also expressed concerns about the safety of this vacant house as these vacant <br />buildings tend to be an attractive nuisance. <br />The issue of stormwater ponding anywhere close to Lake Minnetonka is going to be a very expensive <br />and diftlcult problem as very few property owners are going to be readily willing to give up <br />lakeshore property for stormwater ponding purposes. The possible acquisition of the property, at <br />3445 Crystal Bay Road, with the vacant house may be worth investigating further. According to the <br />I Icnnepin County tax records, this property w as purchased by Ace Properties, in September of 2001, <br />for $270,000. However, the tax records indicate that this “Sale was Excluded from Assessment <br />Analysis,” so the relationship between this sale price and the actual property value may not be <br />entirely valid. The total market property valuation, as of January 2. 2002. which was used for the <br />2002 tax purposes was $215,500 (Land- $205,000. Building- $10,500). If there is any interest in <br />investigating the possible acquisition of this property by the City, the next step would be to have an <br />appraiser complete a valuation study for this property. <br />Page 3 of 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.