My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
10-14-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:18:24 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:50:00 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Application Deadline: 8^1/02 <br />60 Day Deadline: 10/18/02 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Department Approval: <br />Name: Wendy ^ttenberg <br />Title: Zoning Administrator <br />^ ^pt/nq : <br />DATE: <br />ITEM NO. ? <br />Agenda Section; Zoning <br />Item Description: #02-2828 Tony Lund <br />4515 North Shore Drive (vacant lot) <br />Variances <br />Exhibits: <br />A Resolution <br />B Stall Report and exhibits of 9/16/02 <br />Pertinent Code Sections: <br />1. Section 10.24, Subd. 5(B): Lot Area: The lot is 26,920 s.f. where 43,560 s.f. is the minimum lot <br />area for the LR-IB zoning district. <br />2. Section 10.24, Subd. 5(B): Lot Width: The lot is 65* wide where 140' is the minimum lot width <br />for the LR-IB zoning district. <br />Application Summary: The applicant is proposing to construct a new residence on a vacant lot <br />that does not meet lot area or lot width requirements. <br />A lot width variance is required due to the lot being 65* wide at the shoreline where 140* is required <br />in the LR-IB zoning district, measured at the shoreline and at the 75* setback. <br />A lot area variance is required due to the lot being 26,920 s.f. where 43,560 s.f. is required in the LR- <br />1B zoning district. Neither lot area nor width meet the 80?^o standard for sewered lots in 1 acre zone. <br />The proposed residence meets all setbacks in the LR-IB zoning district, llie proposed residence <br />meets structural and hardcover coverage requirements of city ordinances. <br />Discussion: <br />When land use applications requiring lot area and/or lot width variances are submitted and reviewed <br />a condition (hardship) looked at is whether there is land available to combine to make the property <br />conforming. This property does not have land available to combine in order for it to meet <br />conformity. <br />This property has been vacant and was owned by the adjacent property owner since the early 1980*s. <br />The lot was part of the Bergquists*s Addition to Saga Hill subdivision. The Bergquists*s Addition <br />to Sage Hill took place in the 1950 ’s. The Bcrgquists*s Addition to Saga Hill included land along <br />North Shore Drive which was subdivided into 9 lots of similar size. The subject lot was never built <br />on. The properties in the Bcfgquist’s Addition met the zoning standards of the time. Undercurrent
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.