My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-26-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
08-26-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:17:27 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:47:39 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, AUGUST 12,2002 <br />PUBLIC HEARING—7:05 p.m. <br />4. North Arm Paving Project <br />Gappa stated that the City had received a petition from 3 residents on North Arm Drive <br />retjuesting an assessment of a paving project for the street, which is currently a gravel <br />surface. The short paved portion of the road would be reclaimed and repaired, with the <br />rest of the drive being paved. Staff contacted all seven residents on the road by letter and <br />published a notice of the hearing. <br />The project was estimated to cost $31,835 assessed to seven residents at $4,550 per <br />property over a 10-year period at 6.5% interest. The final cost to residents would be about <br />$650 per year. <br />Jim Nielson of340 North Arm Drive stated that he and his wife, Ria, both support the <br />project and hoped the Council would approve it. <br />Dave Supprell of345 North Arm Drive stated that he and his wife also support the project <br />and hoped the Council would approve it. <br />Meg Pendelton of 350 North Arm Drive stated that she and her husband also support the <br />project and hoped the Council would approve it. <br />Carol Pass of235 North Arm Drive stated that she and her husband did not want the road <br />paved because they were trying to create a conservation/natural area on their property at <br />the end of the road. They felt paving the road would change the feel of the area. They <br />want it to remain a “country lane.” She also stated that she grew up on the property and <br />they used to maintain the road themselves bv moving the gravel around, and she felt that <br />pavement would be harder to keep in good repair due to potholes. <br />Gappa stated that the road has a substantial base and should take paving without issue. <br />Murphy asked if the residents get potholes in the gravel. Several neighbors responded <br />they do. <br />Mark Larson of 366 North Arm Drive stated that he was undecided on the issue and saw <br />both sides of the debate. He asked how Council would make a decision without hearing <br />from all seven residents. <br />Carol Pass stated that she had a neighbor’s vote against the project. <br />Meg Pendelton stated that she calls the City twice each spring and fall to complain about <br />the road condition and get them out for repairs. The gravel is dirty and washes into yards <br />and drives. <br />J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.