08-12-2002 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r. #02-2789 (Revised) Dahlstrom Development LLC August 9,2002 Page? 4. Staff concurs with the 4 recommendations of the Park Commission. 5. Staff concurs with those still-applicable general engineering comments provided by City Engineer Tom Kellogg in relation to the original Concept Plan review and which are included in the Planning Commission ’s July 12 packet; the appropriate comments and conditions should be included in the Concept Plan Approval Resolution. 6. In regards to landscaping within the development, final landscaping plans will be developed during the Development Approval process and will be reviewed by the City ’s consulting landscape planner for conformity with the RPUD standards. Landscaping plans for the commercial outlots can be deferred until those sites are developed, unless Council wishes to have certain perimeter features dcveloped/installed at some earlier development stage. D. Summary Recommendation. Based on the above, staff recommends approval of the Revised Concept Plan as presented to the Planning Commission on July 15-17 subject to the comments, standards and conditions as described in this memo. Staff recommends that Council direct staff to draff a Resolution of Concept Plan Approval incorporating the appropriate recommendations of the Planning Commission, Park Commission, staff and City consultants, referencing all specific plan details provided by or to be provided by the applicants which accurately depict the Concept Plan as understood by the Council, and describing all necessary City commitments as well as actions, submittals and commitments to be made by the Developer in order to gain Development Plan Approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to direct staff to draff a Resolution for Concept Plan Approval for consideration and adoption at the August 26 Council meeting. 60-Day Review Period Extension Required. The applicants on June 24 granted the City a 60-day extension for review of the Revised Concept Plan. That 60-day period expires August 23, prior to the August 26 meeting at which resolution adoption would occur. While it could be argued that the initial 60-day clock was restarted on June 24 (and that the City merely needs to notify applicant of an additional 60-day extension to October 23), it may be prudent to formally request that the applicant grant this additional 60-day extension to avoid any misunderstanding. Absent agreement to such a further extension, Council’s options include taking action on August 12 to deny the application.