Laserfiche WebLink
#02-2789 (Revised) Dahlstrom Development LLC <br />August 9,2002 <br />Page 5 of? <br />B. Reaoning <br />1. The entire property is currently zoned RR-ID Single Family Rural Residential, 2-acre <br />minimum lot size. Rezoning the portion of the property north of Kelley Parkway to RPUD <br />Residential Planned Unit Development is appropriate based on the multi-family residential <br />nature of the proposal. Actual rezoning should occur only upon Development Plan Approval. <br />2. Because the property south of Kelley Parkway is guided for commercial office use, that <br />property should be rezoned consistent with the intended use. Such a rezoning is technically <br />required within 9 months of the date the CMP was approved (October 2001), i.c. rezoning <br />will soon be overdue. At this time the applicant does not have a specific proposal for <br />development of the commercial office outlets. The most appropriate zone for the intended <br />commercial office uses is B-6 Highway Commercial District. The B-6 District was <br />specifically created to accommodate the uses guided by the CMP for the Highway 12 <br />corridor. The B-6 District primarily allows non-retail uses such as offices, banks, libraries <br />and motels/hotels, and allows Class I restaurants only as a conditional use. Rezoning the two <br />proposed commercial outlets to B-6 would be appropriate at the time of Development Plan <br />Approval, regardless whether the outlots have been proposed for specific uses at that time. <br />C. Revised Concept Plan Elements <br />1 . Staff concurs with all seven of the Planning Commission’s ‘General Comments’ as noted in <br />Exhibit B, and recommends that these comments be incorporated as findings or conditions <br />(as appropriate) within the Concept Plan Approval Resolution to be drafted. <br />2. Staff concurs with items 1 thru 9 of the Planning Commission’s 17-point ‘Specific <br />Comments’ as noted in Exhibit B. Staff also concurs witli items 12 and 14 thru 17 of the <br />Planning Commission recommendation. <br />3. Regarding items 10,11 and 13 ofthe Planning Commission’s‘Specific Conunents’regarding <br />transportation issues (streets, sidewalks, trails, etc.), additional discussion by Council is <br />needed to reach a conclusion, as the various reviewing entities and the developer each have <br />somewhat divergent views on road w idths, trail and/or sidewalk locations, parking needs, etc. <br />Staffs recommendation on transportation matters can be summarized as follows: <br />a) Kelley Parkway: <br />Platted Width : 60'minimum <br />Paved Width : 32' fc/fc (face of curb to face of curb) minimum, with no on-street parking: