Laserfiche WebLink
#02-2789 (Revised) Dahlstrom Development LLC <br />August 9.2002 <br />Page 3 of? <br />Additional Information <br />Concept Plan Detail Depictions. Applicants have displayed a number of boards depicting various <br />aspects of the Revised Concept Plan but have not presented the City with copies for review. Any <br />such depictions which Council wishes to reference in approving the Revised Concept Plan should <br />be submitted so that they can be referenced in the Concept Plan Approval Resolution. <br />Updated Fees Estimate. At the request of the applicant, staff has drafted an updated Estimate of Fees <br />(Exhibit C) that relate to the application and development stages of the process. <br />Traffic Study. Transportation Issues . StafThas met with Shelley Johnson of Bonestroo & Associates <br />regarding a transportation study for the Highway 12 area from County Road 6 to the Burlington <br />Northern tracks, from Willow to Old Crystal Bay Road, and including the Dumas/James properties <br />west of Old Crystal Bay. He has submitted a proposed scope of services (Exhibit G) to complete a <br />comprehensive traffic/transportation study involving seven specified tasks including: data collection <br />& field reconnaissance, intersection analysis (6 major intersections in the study area), access <br />management, Kelley Parkway Planning, Dahlstrom proposal review, and area roadway plan, with <br />all the above documented in a report form. <br />Johnson’s specific comments regarding the Revised Concept Plan were received on August 8 and <br />are attached as Exhibit F. Council should review these at the August 12 meeting, especially in <br />regards to 1) interior road widths and design to accommodate various needs; turning radii; turn lanes <br />2) main entrance design; 3) roundabout features and limitations; 4) parking; 5) Kelley Parkway <br />design issues. <br />Applicant has indicated a willingness to pay for the portions of the traffic study which are related to <br />the proposed development. Staff notes that certain aspects of that report will potentially have an <br />impact on transportation elements of the Revised Concept Plan, and any approval should be subject <br />to the recommendations of the traffic/transportation study. <br />Density and Housing Goals. The Planning Commission was relatively pleased with the mix and <br />types of dwelling units offered in the Revised Concept Plan, although they expressed some concern <br />as to whether the anticipated price points actually ser\e the needs of this market. The developer has <br />not provided the City with any documentation as to a market analysis, and Planning Commission <br />again requested that this information be provided. <br />Planning Commission noted that in terms of density, the overall plan is at 6 units per acre (168 units <br />on 28 dry buildable acres) accounted for by 104 towmbome units on 24.5 dry acres (4.2 units per <br />acre) and 64 Lofts units on 3.5 dry acres (18 units per acre). Overall density in the range of 3-6 units <br />per acre is contemplated in the CMP as acceptable, and such density is probably necessary in order <br />to begin approaching our housing goals. The City’s housing goals are enumerated in the table on <br />CMP Page 3C-18 (see Exhibit H) which indicates a goal of 160 affordable owner-occupied <br />townhomes being provided between 2000 and 2010; “affordable’ is defined for purposes of the CMP