My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-22-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
07-22-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:16:23 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:37:55 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
555
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
minutes of the orono planning commission <br />MEETING HELD ON JUNE 16,1997 <br />(#9 - #2248 David and Jodi Rahn - Continued) <br />to grt . good .ens* <br />future garage would be out/de the ^ ^ ® ‘'”**«‘*«* <br />he.«d.d.35.«,b«,. <br />Sr!rS'.‘Z!^±'“ *v ^ “"“*= Roi" Mid the stn.ctu« would be lo«tt«l <br />^ WM infonned that the appUcant plana on residing in this residence She asked if h, <br />had co^dered a two-story design rather than expw.4 out. JSS' Ws^dX <br />Smilh said she had a problem supporting a plan with doubling hardcover in the 0-75' and <br />asked for less impact in this setback. Rahn said the current house is 600 s f. and the <br />prop<^ IS at a minimum at 1.300 gross floor area. He noted the residence next door is <br />at a coverage and was buUt in 1983 which has the same standards as curr^y exists <br />He noted a lot hne rearrangement in 1961 deemed the property buildable. ^ <br />There were no public comments at this time. <br />Lmdquirt noted Aat buildable propei ies are allowed 15% structural coverage and the <br />propose IS at 1328 s.f. Concern was voiced with the structure location in the 0-75' but <br />Lindquist noted there is no other location in which the structure can be located. <br />Lindquist moved, Schroeder seconded, to approve Application #2248 fora conditional <br />use permit for iMd alteration for setback in the flood plain, hardcover at 19% lakeshore <br />setback as existing, and side setback if necessary. ’ <br />S(&oed« io^ if, side setback is required even though no changes are made due <br />to tte ongin^ vmraM requued for the property. If necessary, a side yard setback <br />variance would be included in the abov'e motion. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. .
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.