Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, May 28,2002______ <br />(#02-2772 JOHN AND DONNA CROTTEAU, Continued) <br />White revbed his motion to included the proposed amendment, Nygard seconded. Vote: 4/1, <br />with Mayor Peterson dissenting. <br />Barrett clarified that the garage addition had been withdrawn from the application. <br />* 7. #02-2777 Tom Meehan, 2825 Little Orchard Way - Conditional Use Permit - <br />Resolution No. 4818 <br />Sansevcre moved, Murphy seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4818 granting a Conditional Use <br />Permit to allow plumbing in an accessoiy building. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />* 8. #02-2779 Jerad and Leslie Hahn, 809 Brown Road North - Conditional Use Permit - <br />Resolution No. 4819 <br />Sanses ere moved, Murphy seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4819 granting a Conditional Use <br />Permit to allow plumbing in an accessory building. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />9. #02-2782 Professional Properties of Orono, 2765 Kelley Parkway - Proposed Dental <br />Office - Conceptual Rezoning and Site Plan Review <br />GaiTron reported that the applieants propose to construct a one story, 15,000 s.f. dental office and <br />professional building on the 2.0 acre existing lot at the NE corner of Old Cry stal Bay Road and <br />Highway 12. The request is for a PUD rezoning of the property from RR-IB Single Family Rural <br />Residential to B-6 Highway Commercial District. <br />Gaffron summarized that the actions requested this evening were to consider conceptual approval <br />for PUD rezoning and the preliminary proposed use, review and comment on the commercial site <br />plan, and direct staff to draft a Resolution Granting Concept Plan Approval for action on June 10. <br />The Planning Commission had concluded that the dental otfice use was consistent with the 2000- <br />2020 Community Management Plan guiding of this site for office use, and that B-6 was the <br />appropriate zoning district for this use. Gaffron noted that the Planning Commission not only <br />recommended approval of the rezoning 7-0, but recommended the Concept Plan Approval as well. <br />Gaffron pointed out several questions for consideration; is Council satisfied with the percentage of <br />green space, the site circulation and parking, should a greater buffer be required between the existing <br />trail and parking, should the northerly row of parking more closely meet the 20 ’ setback <br />requirement, should a traffic study take place, and several others as noted in his memo. <br />Sansevere inquired as to the approximate number of clients that could potentially be in and out of <br />their offices daily. <br />Page 6 of 16 <br />4 <br />■ifi TSfcaF'hoi