My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-10-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
06-10-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:15:15 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:27:36 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, Mav 28,2002______ <br />(M)2-2782 PROFESSIONAL PROPERTIES OF ORONO, Continued) <br />Dr. Berg stated that the otTices would house appro.ximately 5 services. He maintained that with the <br />built-in efficiencies of a drop-off site and full building circulation the flow would not be an issue. <br />Dr. Kottemann stated that he sees approximately 60-80 patients daily. <br />Dr. Eberts noted that he services approximately 40 visitors daily. <br />Sansevere noted that the offices will ser\'e several hundred patients daily. <br />Murphy questioned whether simply too much is trying to be squeezed onto this 2 acre parcel. He <br />asked whether the building could be made any smaller. <br />Dr. Berg maintained that in order to make the whole project feasible, they need to have the building <br />as large as possible. <br />Sansevere commented that he had heard the site to the east may also be developed w ith dental uses. <br />Gaffron noted that the property to the east was approximately 2 acres and guided for office use. <br />While Sansevere agreed that access around the building is necessary, he questioned the visual impact <br />that less green space on the backside would have on traffic heading west on Highway 12. <br />Gaffron noted that all sides of this building virtually have to be treated like the front. <br />Mayor Peterson asked what it w ould mean if the Council could not support 10' setbacks. <br />White stated that the Council believes this to be a good use, and with the low demand for office <br />space currently, he supported the concept. He also complimented the Doctors on how the design <br />picks up the look of the City Hall. <br />Mayor Peterson, once again, questioned the setbacks. She stated that wtiere exceptions have been <br />made in the past she has been disappointed by the result. <br />Sansevere asked whether Kelley Parkway would be moved. <br />Gaffron noted that while the re-location of Kelley Parkway is not currently planned, if it were <br />moved, the size of this parcel may change. <br />Murphy stated that once construction on Highway 12 begins, the stack up will be substantial. <br />Sansevere acknowledged that the complex can look good even if it is heavily packed. He did have <br />other questions regarding the minimum entrance and access. <br />PagcTof 16
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.