Laserfiche WebLink
*1 • * <br />study further the question of whether a revision to the Constitution was needed and if so, what <br />changes were recommended. <br />The Board Subcommittee, Chaired by Independence Mayor Marvin Johnson, and composed <br />of Jordan Mayor Ron Jabs, Buffalo Councilmember Del Haag, and Prior Lake Manager Frank <br />Boyles, met two times to study the issue. The Subcommittee submitted its recommendation <br />to the full Board at its April 18,2002 meeting. After discussions at the April meeting, the <br />Board again considered the revision at its May 16,2002 meeting. Following further <br />discussion, the Board reconunended the proposed changes indicated in the attached document. <br />What are the most significant changes affecting member rights? <br />Some of the more significant changes that members will see in the proposed revision are as <br />follows: <br />Instead of a dues schedule being approved by the members at the Annual Conference, <br />the Board would approve a dues increase only after at least 60 days prior written <br />notice to the members and an affirmative vote of at least 12 of the 18 Board members. <br />The Board felt that the added notice to members and the super majority approval <br />process, actually would afford great member input into the dues setting process, since <br />many cities are not represented at the Annual Meeting, held as part of the Annual <br />Conference. Since there is already authority for a dues increase for the coming year, it <br />is recommended that this new authority become effective for the 2003-04 fiscal year. <br />The Board would be given the authority to set legislative policies and to design a <br />legislative policy development process that “encourages and ma.\imizes” member <br />input. The Board believed that the current process could be improved upon, to <br />provide for greater member participation and to provide the Board greater flexibility to <br />respond to emerging legislative issues. <br />The existing practice of providing designated Board seats for the cities of Minneapolis <br />and St. Paul, and for a representative from the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities <br />and the Minnesota Association of Small Cities would be formally recognized. The <br />Board believed that the make up of the Board was a core governance issue that ought <br />to be reflected in the Constitution. Since the Board election process is already well <br />under way for the current year, the Board recommends that this change take effect for <br />elections in June, 2003. <br />A formal Finance Committee would be established to take the place of the existing <br />Budget Commillce, The Board felt a standing Finance Committee would be a better <br />mechanism to assist the Board in reviewing and making recommendations on <br />important League financial matters, such as meeting and conferring with the auditor, <br />receiving regular financial updates, and making budget and dues recommendations. <br />The existing Budget Committee, which met only once a year, had duties that were <br />much more limited in scope. <br />--