My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
05-28-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 9:30:28 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:27:20 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
*‘Subd. I. Lands For Public Use. The City finds that when land is subdivided, including a <br />planned residential development or a planned unit development, the resulting additional housing <br />units or commercial/industrial buildings have an impact on the City's park system. Therefore, <br />pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, (1989), Section 462.358, subd. 2b, the City requires all persons, <br />corporations or other legal entities that subdivide land within the City of Orono; as a prerequisite to <br />approval of a lot division, final plat, planned residential development or planned unit development; <br />to convey to the City or dedicate to the public, for use as parks, playgrounds, trails, or open space, <br />a given percentage of the land being platted or developed as hereinafter specified, said portions to <br />be approved by the City. In lieu thereof, the subdivider shall, at the option of the City pay to the City, <br />for use in the acquisition, development or improvement ofpublic parks, playgrounds, trails, wetlands <br />or open spaces and debt retirement in connection with the foregoing, an equivalent amount in cash <br />based upon the fair market value of the land to be developed. The form of contribution (cash or land, <br />or any combination thereoO shall be decided by the City Council based upon the need and <br />conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The amount of the dedication requirement shall be <br />roughly proportional to the impact of the subdivision on the City's park system.” <br />If the application is determined to be subject to park dedication. Council will also have to determine <br />whether the trail dedication will be credited toward the park fee, since the sale price of the parcel is <br />already being reduced by the full value of the area used for the existing trail. 8% of the purchase <br />price of the site would be approximately $35,000; the maximum commercial park fee that would be <br />due for this 2 acre site under the 2002 fee schedule is $27,750. <br />Signage, Lighting, Landscaping <br />Applicant is proposing 2 monument signs on the site (see Plan Sheet S1.1). There are no B-6 signage <br />standards spelled out in the code; however, the proposed office use would be most akin to the B-4 <br />district standards; <br />- up to one square foot of signage per front foot of building <br />- plus up to one square foot of signage for each front foot not occupied by building <br />- no individual sign shall exceed 50 square feet <br />• 10' setback from property line required for freestanding signage <br />• maximum height no higher than 6' above the highest outside wail of the building <br />The larger sign shown on S 1.1 has a sign area of 64 s.f. and would require a variance. The site <br />would be allowed as much as 304 s.f. of signage based on the frontage along Kelley Parkway. The <br />two signs meet required setbacks and the higher sign meets the 12* height of the wall of the building. <br />Plaiming Commission should determine whether there are any issues with the signage. <br />Applicant should be required to provide a site lighting plan for review. <br />Proposed landscaping is shown on sheet L2.1. Because the site plan is contiunually being revised, <br />staff has not reviewed this plan in relation to the B-6 standards. The City has not yet established a <br />specific ‘greenway’ plan for Kelley Parkway; this may be a topic for the Park Commission to <br />consider. The landcape plan does propose a substantial amount of plantings of trees, shrubs and <br />ground cover. Although a calculation has not been done for the most recent site plan, staff estimates <br />that the site is 25% green space, 20% building, and 55% parking/driving/patio/sidewalks. <br />#02-2782 Profcwional Propcriicf of Orono <br />May 17,2002 <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />. ____
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.