Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, APRIL 8,2002 <br />PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS—DEBORAHHALVORSON, <br />REPRESENTA TIVE —Continued <br />compressing the roots in a new area would damage, and probably kill the trees. Mrs. <br />Twidwell stated they have the support of their neighbors and the Planning Commission. <br />She asked the Council for their support as well. <br />Sansevere asked if the trees could be viewed as a hardship. Gaffron stated that staff posed <br />the question in order to stimulate discussion. If the Council were to approve the <br />application, they would need to draft a resolution stating the unique nature of the case. <br />White stated that hardcover is very hard on trees and that he knew of several people who <br />added hardcover to their properties and lost trees as a result of it. He slated he was in <br />favor of the application. <br />Nygard asked if the driveway could be reduced. <br />Mike Sherridan, the Twidwell’s builder, stated that the driveway was currently planned at <br />18’ wide. It would be possible to narrow it some along the south side, where the trees are. <br />He stated a 4’ reduction would result in about a 160 s.f hardcover reduction. <br />Julie Bom of 188S Concordia Street stated that there are hedges along her property edge, <br />and they live on a hill reducing visibility of the road, therefore it was important the <br />Twidwells be able to enter the street facing forward from their driveway. <br />Gaffron stated the driveway reduction would reduce hardcover by about 1.5%. <br />Flint stated he favored supporting the application because they were making <br />improvements from the current house. <br />Barrett stated they could not use two sets of rules and warned that if the application were <br />approved, it would likely have a precedential element. Flint suggested making it clear in <br />the resolution that they are reducing hardcover and moving the house back from the <br />lakeshore, making it less oppressive. Barrett stated that the current plan is better and more <br />cohesive than the current structure on the lot, and the applicants have tmly struggled to <br />Qnd a suitable plan. <br />Nygard stated the only way for the Twidwells to reduce hardcover was to reduce the size <br />of the house, reduce the driveway, or move the house back on the lot. Gaffron stated that <br />would affect the neighbors by the domino effect. <br />Liz Hawn stated that the Plaiming Commission routinely considers a tear down the same <br />as new construction and uses first principles when considering applications. To look at <br />what is merely better than before leaves them open to ^proving undesirable construction. <br />r».v>to V f ■,.'1 t’.fi. i.iAJtrirrhi'Tni