My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-22-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
04-22-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:14:10 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:24:27 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
297
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, APRIL 8,2002 <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS—LIZ HAWN, REPRESENTATIVE <br />None. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />None. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />5. #2461 William and Thelma Br> son, and James A. R. Johnson, 650,660,670, and <br />680 Big Island—Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement <br />Gaffron stated that the applicant had requested the application be tabled. <br />Mayor Peterson moved, and W hite seconded, tabling Item #5 William and Thelma <br />Bryson, and James A. R. Johnson, 650,660,670, and 680 Big Island—Subdivision of <br />a Lot Line Rearrangement. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS—DEBORAH HALVORSON, <br />REPRESENTATIVE <br />Bottenberg stated that the Twidwells were proposing to tear down the existing house on <br />their property and construct a new residence. They had already considered several <br />remodeling schemes for the existing house and had revised their plans for new <br />construction three times in an attempt to meet the 15% lot coverage for structures, setback <br />requirements, and save three mature maple trees in the 75 - 250 ’ setback zone. The <br />current plan meets setback, average setback, and lot coverage standards, but hardcover in <br />the 75 - 250 ’ setback zone is proposed at 33.54% where only 25% is allowed. The <br />applicants ’ preferred plan keeps all three of the maple trees. The Planning Commission <br />recommended approval. Bottenberg stated that staff found the lot is conforming and does <br />not warrant a hardcover variance. <br />Nancy Twidwell stated that they began plans to remodel two years ago, but because of <br />drainage issues, they have been advised to do a tear down and rebuild. They are currently <br />looking at their fourth set of new construction plans. They are trying hard to preserve <br />three 60-year-oId maple trees, meet codes, and meet their family’s needs. <br />She stated that keeping the driveway where it currently exists is best for the health of the <br />trees. They hired an arborist who recommended keeping the drive in place because the <br />trees’ root systems are used to the compression in those areas. Moving the drive, and
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.