My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-25-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
02-25-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 9:59:44 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:16:42 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
335
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#02-2755 Fire Station PlatA'ar/CUP <br />February 22,2002 <br />Page 3 <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />for residential uses is based on the zoning density; this is currently a 2-acre zone but could <br />change to 2-3 ur its per acre SFR or even 4+ units per acre MFR depending on its ultimate <br />use, which is ar yet undecided. Council must consider whether the Trunk Fee is applicable <br />to Lotsl or 2, and if so, whether the Fee should be required, waived or deferred. <br />Documenting allowable fire station uses. Planning Commission recommended that Council <br />should discuss and clearly document (via ordinance, restrictive covenants or other method) <br />the City’s intent for allowed uses of the fire station site, given that this is in a residential <br />neighborhood. The uses should be limited to fire department related uses; i.e. it is not in a <br />location for it to become a ‘community center*, and not suited for high intensity, high trafTic <br />uses. Lighting and signage should be low key. <br />Lot 2 Status - ‘Lot* or ‘Outlot’? Planning Commission briefly discussed whether Lot 2 <br />should be platted as an Outlot rather than as a buildable site. Outlot status would require <br />a future re-platting to make Lot 2 buildable. This can be a valuable tool when the future use <br />of a site is in doubt and the owner wants to delay certain development decisions or payment <br />of fees. While the City will own Lot 2 and have total control of it, the City is undecided as <br />to how it might ultimately be used. If the City sells it to a developer for a specific use, it may <br />be less difficult to collect impact fees (park fees, stormwater fees, road costs, sewer & water <br />costs, etc.) via a re-platting process as compared to a mere sale. Therefore, staff is <br />suggesting that Council should strongly consider platting Lot 2 as an Outlot. <br />Road Corridor - Public Dedication or Outlot? The road corridor is shown on the preliminary <br />plat as an Outlot rather than as a dedicated road. However, this means that it will have a <br />separate ta.x ID similar to a private road. This also creates the need for easements if it is not <br />jointly owned by an association of all parcels benefitting by it. This road is going to be <br />public in nature since it will scr\c not only the fire station but any future residential <br />development to the east, and could potentially even be a through road to Long Lake. It would <br />be most appropriate to dedicate it as a public road on the plat (it will then need a name...). <br />One option is to name it the same as the road it aligns w ith best in Long Lake, which likely <br />is Orchard Lane. This would make sense if it is to become a through road someday. If it’s <br />never going to be a through road, it should have a different name. The plat name is proposed <br />as Willowfire Addition; the road could be Willowfire Drive... <br />Application Fees/Costs. No application fees have been paid; the standard application fee for <br />the variance would be S250, for the CUP would be S250, and for the subdivision would <br />be S375 plus ancillary road review costs, engineering and legal actual costs, etc. Out-of- <br />pocket costs for surveying-'platting w ill be approximately S4,000, and additional fees will be <br />incurred for legal work and filing the documents. Staff recommends that as a minimum, <br />all out-of-pocket and consultant costs be charged. <br />I <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.