My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-28-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
01-28-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 9:16:16 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:14:21 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#01-2739 Thomas and Mary Dahlquist <br />4070 Dahl Road <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />1 The deck addition would 3 Vi out from the exterior wall of the house. The roof overhang extends <br />approximately 3’ from the house. Nearly the entire walkway would be covered with “hardcover ” <br />from the roof line. No hardcover is located below the walkway, thus the total overhead hardcover <br />is virtually equal to the existing based on the walkway being located below the roof line. <br />There is no deck to gro'ind access from the existing lakeside deck, except though the house. The <br />deck is approximately 1 O' above ground elevation. The walkway would connect to the side entrance <br />and provide e.\terior access and an exit for the lakeside deck. Without the exterior access to the new <br />walkway safety is a concern. <br />Planning Commission also recommended approval of an after the fact variance to permit an existing garage <br />to remain on the property located 7 from the property line where a 10' setback is required. Planning <br />Commission recommendation is based on the following findings of fact; <br />I. The lot is very narrow at the street. <br />Relocating the shed further from the property line would move it too close to the existing driveway. <br />3.The shed was located to be as far as possible from view to the adjacent property owner located at <br />4080 Dahl Road. The neighbor's house is located much further back on the property due to the <br />unusus*.! property dimensions of the two lots. If the shed were required to meet the required 10' <br />setback the shed would have to be moved further up the driveway and very close in proximity to the <br />neighboring house. <br />4. The shed is located over a rock bed and does not have a permanent foundation. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />To adopt attached resolution. The resolution approves the variances as noted in the Planning Commission <br />recommendation. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Motion to adopt the attached resolution approving variances.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.