My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-14-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
01-14-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 9:15:36 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:14:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Tapping city fund balances through state aid cuts would be a one-time source of revenue <br />for the state and would not solve the ongoing state budget problem. <br />• Looking at city fund balances on December 31 is very deceiving since cities have just <br />received state aid payments an 1 property ta.\ settlements. It is akin to looking at your <br />checkbook on payday and believing you have a lot of money, wthout accounting for the <br />bills that must be paid. <br />• Financial advi.sors have indicated that bond ratings could be adversely affected by a <br />forced depletion of reserves. <br />Although the governor and others have recently criticized city and county fund balances, at this <br />time we believe that neither the legislature nor the governor will propose legislation that will <br />directly force cities to deplete their reserves. A more likely scenario might be that the governor <br />or legislators rationalize general cuts in city aids by concluding that local reserves are higher than <br />they need to be and that cities can weather the cuts without cutting ser\ ices or raising taxes. If <br />that scenario plays out, there are several points that you may wani to consider. <br />-Cities did not proportionately benefit during the state’s economic growth over the past <br />decade. <br />• In the decade from 1992 to 2002, aid to cities has grown by about 10% while state <br />general fund revenues have increased by over 60%. <br />• Overall, aids to cities were cut by 10% for 2002 alone. <br />• Cities have paid a sales lax since the last state recession in the early 1990s. Cities and <br />counties now pay over $100 million per year in sales tax. <br />-Cutting aid to cities will have consequences <br />• Aids and taxes pay for city services. Reducing aids will affect the level of ser\ ices <br />citizens receive. <br />• The largest expenditure category for cities is public safety. Depending on the extent of <br />aid cuts, public safety expenditures could be impacted at a time when citizen demands for <br />increased public safety are rising. <br />• Financial advisors have indicated that city- bond ratings could be adversely affected <br />depending on the nature and severity of cuts. Preserving bond ratings is as important to <br />cities as to the state; they directly affect tlie cost of government. <br />• All of these impacts could be compounded in cities with low property values because <br />they cannot as easily compensate for aid cuts. <br />If you have general questions on fund balances, contact Eric Willette or Gary Carlson at the <br />League offices.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.