My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-2003 Council Work Session
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
11-13-2003 Council Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2023 3:39:53 PM
Creation date
2/8/2023 3:39:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
52. <br />would you attempt to recover less <br />than twenty-five percent, twenty- <br />five percent to fifty percent, <br />fifty to seventy-five percent, <br />seventy-five percent to one-hun <br />dred percent, or more than one- <br />hundred percent of the costs? <br />Let's talk about pedestrian and bicycle trails_ _ <br />53.Would you favor or oppose a trail <br />system linking parks and recrea <br />tional facilities within the com <br />munity? (IF "FAVOR," ASK:) Would <br />you still favor it if a property <br />tax increase were required to de <br />velop the system? <br />54.If a citywide trail system were <br />built, should it primarily serve <br />pedestrians, primarily serve bicy <br />clists, or serve both? <br />LESS THAN 25%. . . . <br />25% - 50%. . . . . . . <br />50% - 75%. . . . . . . <br />75% - 100%. . . . . . <br />OVER 100%. . . . . . . <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED... .28% <br />trails.... <br />FAVOR/STILL FAVOR.... .36% <br />FAVOR/NO. . . . . . .. .22% <br />FAVOR/UNSURE. . . . .. .12% <br />OPPOSE. . . . . . . . .. .26% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.. <br />PRIMARY PEDESTRIANS.. . .6% <br />PRIMARY BICYCLISTS.. <br />BOTH. . . . . . . . . . <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.. <br />The City of Orono's current trail system plan calls for trails <br />adjacent to the City's major local roadways. Another option for <br />trails would be siting them "cross-country," similar to the Luce <br />Line Trail. <br />55.Would you favor or oppose addi <br />tional trails going "cross-coun <br />try" similar to the Luce Line? <br />(WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel <br />strongly that way? <br />STRONGLY FAVOR. . . . .25% <br />FAVOR. . . . . . . . . . .32% <br />S£i-6p^sE;:;:::;m <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED_ _11% <br />IF "STRONGLY FAVOR" OR "FAVOR," ASK; <br />56.Would you still support it <br />if a property tax increase <br />were required to develop <br />these trails? <br />YES. . . . . . . . . . . .65% <br />NO. . . . . . . . . . . . .32% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . .4% <br />57.Would you still favor it if YES. . . . . . . . . . . .74% <br />the trail were to run by your NO. . . . . . . . . . . . .19% <br />property? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . .7% <br />Moving on.... <br />In general, how would you rate the EXCELLENT. . . . . . . .19% <br />maintenance of Orono Park and rec- GOOD. . . . . . . . . ..t.54% <br />reation facilities -- excellent, ONLY FAIR. . . . . . . .12% <br />good, only fair, or poor? POOR. . . . . . . . . . . .3% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED_ _13% <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.