Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, NOVEMBER 24,2003 <br />LMCD REPORT—LILI MCMILLAN, REPRESENTATIVE <br />McMillan stated that they had their annual meeting with the Hennepin County Sheritf s <br />Water Patrol, which enforces the LMCD code on the lake. Overall code enforcement <br />went well. They had a safe summer, except for the July 4''* boating incident. There was a <br />significant increase in BUl's, with 67 in 2003 vs. 22 in 2002. One possible cause would <br />be the good weather. The water patrol campaigned this year to address underage drinking <br />on the lake, which led to a significant increase in citations, with 87 in 2003 vs. 30 in 2002. <br />Licensed deputy and special patrol hours totaled 4,500 on Lake Minnetonka, which came <br />to about 85% of enforcement time for the entire county. The percentage time was <br />consistent with what they’ve done in the past. They had about 33 special deputies <br />(volunteers), which is down with their hours totaling 800 in 2003. They felt 33 was a <br />good number of special deputies. Hennepin County has not yet determined if they’ll fund <br />enough of the budget to have the two extra deputies next summer as well. They should <br />know by the end of December. <br />Murphy asked if the increase in BUI has to do with increased enforcement. McMillan <br />stated they had the same number of deputies last summer. Sansevere stated he believed <br />they stepped up enforcement of BUI after the Big Island problems over July 4*''. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />None. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT <br />3. #02*2829 Orono Zoning Code Amendment—Section 78*71 —Regulation of <br />Nonconforming Uses and Nonconforming Structures <br />Gaffron stated that the Planning Commission had been working on this Zoning Code <br />amendment for about two years. The intent was to add standards for nonconforming <br />structures. The current draft was reviewed by the Planning Commission at a Public <br />Hearing held on November 17***. They recommended approval with a unanimous vote. <br />The draft accomplishes three things: a purpose for the nonconforming uses and structures <br />section, and standards for nonconforming uses and nonconforming structures. It separates <br />the provisions pertaining to "Nonconforming Uses” from those pertaining to <br />“Nonconforming Structures.” It eliminates language that makes the existing section <br />pertinent only to uses, not structures. It eliminates the ’36-months after 1-1*75’ sunset <br />provision for lawful nonconforming use of land not involving a structure or involving a <br />structure with value less than $3000 on 1-1-75. It eliminates language that suggests <br />Council w ould look favorably on the granting of variances where a situation existed <br />legally under laws prior to 1975. It distinguishes between “Involuntary Destruction” and