My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-08-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
12-08-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 8:46:27 AM
Creation date
2/8/2023 3:17:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
350
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, NOVEMBER 24,2003 <br />8. #03-2951 Judith and James Pierpout, 1849 and 1801 West Farm Road—Lot <br />Line Rearrangement—-Continued <br />conversion, and it never happened. <br />Sansevere asked if another CUP would solve the problem. Mayor Peterson stated it would <br />not unless they removed the kitchen. <br />Gaffron stated tliey wc.ild have to remove the kitchen under a plumbing for accessory <br />structure CUP, or receive a variance for the acreage required for the guesthouse. Ga^ron <br />stated that the sink is the primary factor that makes the kitchen, as other fixtures such as <br />stove and refrigerator can be merely purchased and “plugged in.” <br />Mrs. Pierpont stated that she is afraid if the sink were removed, the pipes would freeze <br />and back up into the rest of the plumbing. <br />Sansevere stated he felt a stove made a kitchen. <br />Gaffron stated a kitchen is defined by use, not the appliances installed. He stated if the <br />Pierponts apply for a CUP, the discussion would center on what needs to be pulled out. <br />Mrs. Pierpont stated that the stable had a sink in it before they bought the property. <br />Gaffron asked Mrs. Pierpont if they really need to move the lot lines. She replied not <br />necessarily. Gaffron stated that if the application went away, the City would be faced <br />with enforcing use of the original CUP from 1990, which has never resulted in a <br />complaint. <br />Mrs. Pierpont stated that her younger son has a strong interest in the property, and so <br />she’d be willing to put a deed on the property as it will likely stay in the family. <br />Gaffron stated that the CUP for plumbing in an accessory structure would not be intended <br />for overnight use. <br />Mayor Peterson suggested the Pierponts apply for a CUP application. She asked what <br />needed to be done about the road then. Gaffron stated nothing would need to be done. As <br />long as the properties remained owned by the Pierponts, there would be no issue. Most <br />likely, the road, which passes through lot 14, would be dealt with should the lots ever <br />come under separate ownership. <br />Sansevere asked that if the Pierponts got the CUP, then removed the kitchen, got in two <br />sewer hookups, then could they move the lot line at a later time and put the kitchen back <br />in. The sons could then subdivide the property should they take ownership of the property <br />some day. Mrs. Pierpont stated their intent was to take care of everything themselves so
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.