My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-08-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
12-08-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 8:46:27 AM
Creation date
2/8/2023 3:17:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
350
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, NOVEMBER 24,2003 <br />S. m~29SJ Judith and James PierponU 1849 and 1801 fVest Farm Road—Lot <br />Line Rearraugemeat-^oatiaued <br />police those conditions. <br />McMillan stated the only way to enforce the appropriate use of the guesthouse, is to <br />require the removal the kitchen. <br />White stated he would like to see standards for historical residences, and also a definition <br />of a kitchen. <br />Mrs. Pierpont stated they installed a cooktop to help prepare simple food items for <br />children. Otherwise guests dine at the main house. <br />Gaffron stated that the applicants wanted to move the lot line 3/lOths of an acre, creating a <br />2-acre and a 4-acre lot. Rededicating easement is not an issue. They would still have two <br />buildable sites with sewer coming in to both sites. <br />Mrs. Pierpont stated they want to redefine the lot line because they have the chance to <br />bring in sewer to two lots, defraying the cost of sewer for the nei^bors and making it <br />more feasible for the City to bring sewer. Also, their son suggested they divide lot 14 so <br />that they’d have the option of selling it off someday if they wanted to. They also own a <br />house on 6"' Avenue North, which their son lives in. If someday the property passes to <br />him, he would have the option of selling off lot 14. <br />Gaffron stated that as it currently stands, lot 14 is a separate tax parcel from lot IS. Both <br />lots abut a private road. The only reason to move the lot line, could be because the septic <br />system for lot IS crosses the property line. With sewer coming, lot 14 could remain at 2.2 <br />acres. <br />Barrett stated the Pierponts currently have two lots, so there is no real need to change it. <br />They would then be left with a nonconforming guesthouse on a lot with under 4-acres of <br />dry buildable. If the kitchen were removed, that problem would be solved and they could <br />leave the lots as is. <br />Gaffron stated that the typical kitchen contains a sink, stove and refrigerator. The <br />Planning Commission was not concerned with the Pierponts use of the house, but there is <br />a risk that the next owner could use it as a permanent residence. <br />Murphy stated that there ought to be a better way to insure the future use of the <br />guesthouse than to punish the Pierponts for wanting to leave things as they’ve been for die <br />last decade. <br />McMillan stated that the lots were supposed to be combined in 1990, before the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.