Laserfiche WebLink
A* <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Wednesday, February 19,2003 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />(#03-2866 JUDY AND DAVID ZOSCHKE, Continued) <br />line, and finally, a considerable amount of non-conforming plastic hardcover shall be <br />removed throughout the property. <br />With regard to the average lakeshore setback, Chaput stated that due to the fact that the <br />Chaput indicated that staff would recommend approval of the requested variances with the <br />condition that 1,506 s.f. of plastic hardcover on the property be removed prior to buildine <br />permit approval. ® <br />Chair Smith mdicated that, to her, the removal of the roof in 1993 caused the floorboards <br />to rot, therefore, this application seems to be a mere replacement of what was already on <br />the property. She also noted that the new enclosed portion adds nothing to hardcover, since <br />It IS on tlw upper level. Chair Smith stated that she- W'ould not support any additional <br />removals from the driveway, as the home was on a busy County Road. <br />i\Ir. Zoscl^e stated that they had removed excess driveway hardcover in 1997 and would <br />find It difficult to remove any more today. He maintained that the plastic had been there <br />for 10+ yews under 4 of gravel and 1 ’ of topsoil, noting that it would be a very dirty job to <br />remove and questioned his alternatives. <br />Chair Smith mdicated that the plastic does interfere with the natural runoff occurrence. <br />Gaffron concurred, stating that the removal of plastic has been a policy for 15 years. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Mabusth questioned whether the Commission could tecomt.tend the removal of one se; of <br />Se home" “ “ on the lakeside <br />“".tl'" rf' P™'"* »“• i- would bedifficult to remove, given the size of the garage and the fact that the, are gardeners. <br />PAGE 3 of 26