Laserfiche WebLink
•03.2935 <br />August t4.2003 <br />Pagt4o(S <br />by the Zoning Ordinance. With the addition in 2000 the applicants were required to <br />remove hardcover to remain ivithin the allowed 25% in the 75 ’-250’ zone. City staff <br />i^uired 808 s.f. to be removed in order to remain within the approved levels as part of <br />.k . .11' application. Upon final inspection for the addition project staff noted <br />Jat the bedcover required to be removed had been put back in. The applicants put the <br />driveway hardcover back as a result of Hooding within their home and garage <br />following recommendaUons in regards to the criteria for “undue <br />hardship” pertinent to this application: <br />“The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls." <br />In the opinion of staff this criterion is not met. <br />2. <br />1“™" “ '• P'OP'")' <br />In the opinion ofstaff this criterion is not met. <br />not <br />3.The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.' <br />In the opinion of staff this criterion is met. <br />4.Economic considerations alone sh.all not constitute an undue hardship if <br />re^onable use for the property exist under the terms of the Zoning Chapter.' <br />The applicants have not indicated economic reasons for their request. <br />5. <br />Essir* si:i—I. <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />7. “The Bo^d or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a <br />one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." <br />N/A <br />i <br />i: