My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-08-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
09-08-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2023 2:55:39 PM
Creation date
2/8/2023 2:53:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
183
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SEP 0 8 2003 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION O.. I or ORONO <br />DATE: September 8,2003 <br />ITEM NO. <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Gregory A. Gappa <br />Title Director of Public Services <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Public Services Director ’s Report <br />Item Description: Accept Quotation tor Stubbs Say Road Erosion Project <br />This is an erosion control project to repair an area with severe gully erosion on a property located <br />at 65 Stubbs Bay Road South. This erosion is caused by the discharge from a culvert under Stubbs <br />Bay Road that flows down a steep slope across the property. This culvert drains a large pavement <br />area in the vicinity of the Stubbs Bay/Watcrtown Road intersection. This stormwater then flows <br />through a wetland and strean) complex into Stubbs Bay. The distance from this property to Stubbs <br />Bay is only 2,000 feet. The Stubbs Bay Watershed has been identified by both the City and the <br />Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has a priority area because of the poor water quality in Stubbs <br />Bay. The City's Surface Water Management also identifies this area for the completion of channel <br />erosion projects. Over the past several years, the property owners have tried unsuccessfully to solve <br />this erosion problem. <br />There are two basic methods to correct this problem the traditional method would have been to <br />construct a ripraped channel. This is a costly solution that is not aesthetically pleasing and does not <br />improve water quality. Over the past several years, the use of native vegetation for channel <br />stabilization has become more prevalent. I hese projects are less expensive than riprap, more <br />aesthetically pleasing, and also provide water quality treatment. We are recommending the use of <br />native vegetation channel stabilization techniques for this project. The City now is required to have <br />a NPDES stormwater permit, and this permit require agencies to establish a program for the <br />implementation of Best Management Practices (BMP’s). The installation of native vegetation <br />channels is one of our BMP's, and we need to report on an annual basis BMP's that have been <br />utilized. <br />Our recommendation is that completion of this project with stormwater utility funds is appropriate <br />because of the gully erosion occurring and the amount of public street runoff that flows through this <br />property. This propert>' is substantially impacted by the large amount of storm water drainage <br />flowing through the middle of the property. The priority ranking for stormwater utilitv-funded <br />projects is in this order; first structure flooding problems, second erosion problems, and third areas <br />with poor drainage that is not threatening structures or causing erosion. <br />Page 1 of 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.