Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />Date Application Received: 6-18-03 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 6-18-03 <br />Initial 60-Day Review Period Expires: 8-17-03 <br />60-Day Review Period Extended on 7-30-03 to: 10-16-03 <br />To;Chair Smith and Planning Commissioners <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Mike Gaffron, Planning Director <br />August 12,2003 <br />#03-2919 Kevin & Deborah Thompson, 90 Myrtlewood Road - <br />Variances & CUP - Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area; <br />RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential, 2-acre min. <br />1.729 acres (75,299 s.f.) gross; approx. 1.55 acres (67,000 s.O net dry <br />Application Summary: This item was tabled at your July meeting to allow the applicant to provide <br />additional detail regarding the application. Applicant requests the following: <br />1.Setback variance to construct a 996 s.f. detached garage/pool house/storage building, 23.1* <br />from the side street lot line where a 50' side street setback is required. <br />2.Oversize accessory structure (OAS) variance to allow the new building to be attached to the <br />existing S48 s.f. detached garage via an 11* x 15’ (165 s.f.) greenhouse, for a final accessory <br />structure size of 2009 s.f (no accessory building larger than 1000 s.f is allowed on a lot of <br />0-1.99 acres in area). <br />3.Setback variance to construct a 20' x (900 s.f) swimming pool 1 O' from the side street lot <br />line where a 50' side street setback is normally required. <br />4. CUP for plumbing in an accessory building. <br />Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends: <br />a) Approval of the side street setback variance for the 996 s.f accessory building. <br />b) Denial of the variance to create an oversize accessory structure. <br />c) Denial of the side street setoack variance for the pool at 10' from the lot line; a 15' side <br />street setback might be justified, however, based on tlie size of the pool at 900 s.f, and the <br />lack of impacts on neighbors by a pool at this location. <br />d) Consider whether screening should be required if any or all of the variances are granted. <br />e) Approval of the request for plumbing in an accessory structure, subject to the standard <br />conditions. <br />> ♦List of Exhibits <br />A - Revised plans and elevations D - Code Sections 10.03 Subd. 9F and <br />B - Revised site plan with pool location options 10.20 Subd. 3Q. <br />C - Letter from adjoining property owners E • Memo and Exhibits of July 17