My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-28-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
07-28-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2023 4:26:23 PM
Creation date
2/8/2023 1:56:02 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
511
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, July 21, 2003 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />retaining wall setbacks on the property, and a hardcover variance for excessive hardcover <br />in the 500-1000' zone. This item was tabled at the June meeting to allow applicant to <br />explore ways to reduce the excess hardcover. <br />Allowed = 35% = 6,785.6 s.f. <br />Existing = 50.8% = 9,860 s.f. <br />Initial Proposal = 45.9% = 8,908 s.f. <br />Revised Proposal = 39.7% = 7,693 s.f. <br />The applicant has made a good faith effort to reduce hardcover by eliminating the circle <br />driveway and replacing it with a walkway and stairs in the front yard, and establishing <br />parking spaces near the low'er driveway. Gaffron stated that if the Planning Commission <br />determines that the unique circumstances regarding the history of this property can be <br />deemed as a hardship, then a recommendation for approval of the afler-the-fact variances <br />would be in order <br />As this item was tabled a*, the June meeting in order for applicant to work with staff to <br />reduce the hardcover to as near the 35% limit as possible, staff met with the applicant and <br />discussed each item of hardcover on the property. Applicant made some decisions as to <br />the relative importance of each hardcover item to his use of the property. After working <br />with u landscape architect, the applicant determined that removal of the circular drive <br />could result in a positive impact to the property and result in a hardcover reduction of <br />2,167 s.f, yielding a final 500-1000' hardcover of 7,693 s.f or 39.7%. <br />Gaffron noted that, while additional items of hardcover could be removed, they represent <br />amenities that applicant feels arc integral to his use of the property (patio areas) or which <br />the removal of would reduce the functionality of the site (reduction of the lower driveway <br />surface would make it difficult to maneuver vehicles into that space). <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. The applicant proposes a revised plan such that the hardcover will be reduced to a <br />level of 2,167 s.f. less than the e.xisting but still exceeding that allowed by City Codes by <br />908 s.f <br />2. The applicant's acquisition of the property was finalized before he knew the <br />magnitude of the hardcover excesses. <br />3. Retaining walls that encroach past the lot line or are less than 26' from wetlands <br />should be relocated to be within the property and meet wetland setbacks. While the City <br />has minimal use of the adjacent right-of-ways and they appear to a casual observer as part <br />of this property, the City has no intent to vacate those right-of-ways, hence applicant <br />cannot make the property larger to reduce the hardcover percentage. <br />Gaffron indicated that staff would make the following recommendations: <br />1. If Planning Commission determines that the unique circumstances regarding the <br />PAGE 6 of 37 <br />.1 * <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.