My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-28-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
07-28-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2023 4:26:23 PM
Creation date
2/8/2023 1:56:02 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
511
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(N)3'2904 1300 Shoreline Drive <br />July 24,2003 <br />Page 2 <br />Planning Commluion Recommendation <br />Planning Commission reviewed the revised plan at a public hearing on July 21 and on a vote of 5-2 <br />recommended approval of the revised plan for 39.7% hardcover subject to the following conditions: <br />1.Existing encroachments of wetland or required wetland setbacks by retaining walls, fill <br />or paved surfaces shall be removed. <br />2.Retaining walls shall be removed wherever they extend outside the property boundaries, <br />and any walls to remain within S' of the lot lines should be reviewed by staff to determine <br />whether they are needed to support steep slopes or whether they are purely aesthetic in nature, <br />and those not necessary to support the topography of the site shall be removed. <br />3. All landscape beds lined with fabric or plastic shall have such liner removed. <br />The minority opinion of the Planning Commission (Smith, Fritzler) was that the removals do not <br />reach the 35% limit established by code and they failed to see a hardship supporting the variance. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />The applicant has made a good faith effort to reduce hardcover by eliminating the circle driveway <br />and replacing it with a walkway and stairs in the front yard, and establishing parking spaces near <br />the lower driveway. The result is hardcover of 39.7% where 35% would be allowed. <br />If Council concludes that the unique circumstances regarding the history of this property can be <br />deemed as a hardship, then approval of the after-the-fact variances per the revised removal plan may <br />be in order. <br />Because the Planning Commission recommendation was not unanimous, staff has not drafted a <br />resolution for this application. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Review the proposal and determine whether the hardcover removals to a level of 39.7% are <br />acceptable, and direct staff to draft a resolution for review and adoption at the August 11 meeting.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.