My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-28-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
07-28-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2023 4:26:23 PM
Creation date
2/8/2023 1:56:02 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
511
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Date Application Received: 5-20-03 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 5-23-03 <br />00-Day Review Period Eipires: 7-22-^3 <br />Eitended on 6-20-03 to: 9-20-03 JUL 2 8 2003 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CH v <br />Date: July 24,2003 <br />Item No.: ^ <br />Department Approval:Administrator Approval: <br />Name: Michael P. GafTron <br />Title: Planning Director <br />Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: <br />#03-2904 Richard S. Brown, 1300 Shoreline Drive - After-the-Fact Variance <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Notice of PC Action 7-24-03 <br />B - Draft PC Minutes 7-21-03 <br />C - Memo and Exhibits of 7-17-03 <br />Application Summary: Applicant requested an after-the-fact variance for certain retaining <br />wall setbacks on the property, and a hardcover variance for excessive hardcover in the 500- <br />1000' zone. This item was tabled at the June PC meeting to allow applieant to explore ways to <br />reduce the excess hardcover. A revised proposal was reviewed at the July 21 PC meeting. <br />Allowed = 35% = 6,785.6 s.f. <br />Existing = 50.8% = 9,860 s.f. <br />Initial Proposal = 45.9% = 8,908 s.f. <br />Revised Proposal = 39.7% = 7,693 s.f. <br />Background <br />The applicant purchased this home in November 2002. Before the closing he inquired of the City as <br />to whether the property was in compliance. As no Certificate of Occupancy had yet been issued nor <br />requested, and no inspections had been called for in more than a year, staff visited the site and <br />concluded that hardcover appeared to be excessive. The applicant then executed an agreement <br />drafted by the City Attorney (Exhibit F of 6-11-03 PC memo) to allow temporary occupancy while <br />the matter was resolved. Applicant subsequently had an as-built survey performed, which confirmed <br />that the hardcover was far in excess of that allowed, and portions are outside of the property <br />boundaries and potentially encroach on required wetland setbacks. <br />Applicant provided an initial plan for review at the June PC meeting, proposing hardcover reductions <br />from the existing 50.8% to 45.9%. Planning Commission tabled the proposal and requested further <br />reductions. Applicant then made substantial revisions to the plan by replacing the loop driveway with <br />a sidewalk, reducing the hardcover to 39.7%. <br />L
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.