Laserfiche WebLink
«K)3-2895 <br />July 21,2003 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />75 - 250 4,882 s.f.1,220.5 s.f. <br />(25%) <br />2,283 s.f.* <br />(46.8 %) <br />2,463 s.f. <br />(50.5 %) <br />* After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds <br />Hardcover Variance <br />The applicant is proposing to construct a second story deck on the lake side of the home. <br />The proposed deck would be 12 ’ x 12 ’ with stairs 3’ x 12 ’ extending off the back towards <br />the lake. The construction of this deck with the associated stairway would constitute an <br />additional 180 square feet of hardcover. As mentioned in the background section of this <br />report, the property received a variance to construct 40% hardcover. With the additional <br />driveway space, needed retaining walls, and added bump-out to the home during <br />construction, the hardcover is now in excess of 46%. <br />Lot Coverage by Struetures Variance <br />Currently, the home is in excess of the allowed 1,500 square feet by 28 square feet. This <br />was a result of modifications to the plan upon construction of the home. These <br />modifications include the 1.5’ x 12 ’ two-story bump-out and enlarged deck entry. A <br />variance was never granted for lot coverage by structures. 1 he applicant is proposing a <br />second story deck and stairway off the lake side of the home. This deck would be greater <br />than 6’ above grade and therefore be included in the lot coverage by structures figure. <br />Because the applicant currently does not meet this requirement, is requesting additional <br />structure coverage, and a variance was never granted one must be approved prior to <br />construction of the proposed deck. <br />Hardship Statement <br />The applicant has provided a brief hardship statement in Exhibit A, and should be asked <br />for additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Hardship Analysis <br />In conslde, g appUcatU ms for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated <br />traffic conditions, tight and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safely, and the effect on values of <br />property In the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval <br />for variances front the literal provisions of the Zoning Code In instances where their strict <br />enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the Individual <br />property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when It Is demonstrated that such <br />actions will be in keeping with the spirit and Intent of the Orono Zoning Code. <br />Staff docs not find a hardship for either variance. The existing conditions do not meet the <br />stipulations of the variance that was approved in April 2001. The applicant was held to a <br />specified hardcover amount previously and has exceeded that. Also, the applicant made <br />modifications to the home and property during the construction process which constituted <br />an additional 28 square feet of lot coverage by structures. Should a variance be granted <br />the intent of the code would not be met. Further, the applicant should be held to the 40% <br />hardcover and 1,500 square foot lot coverage by structure stipulations which were <br />approved in April 2001. This would consist of the applicant removing existing hardcover