Laserfiche WebLink
Setbacks; <br />LR-IB Required Existing <br />N03-289S <br />July 21.2003 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />Proposed <br />Front <br />Rear <br />35 ’ <br />30’ <br />25’ <br />LeR Side <br />Right Side <br />Lakeshore <br />10 ’ <br />10’ <br />75 ’ <br />9.5’ <br />6’ <br />99’ <br />9.5’ <br />6’ <br />91’ <br />Structural Coverage; <br />Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br />8,550 s.f. (.20 acres)Allowed: <br />Proposed: <br />1,500 s.f. (15% or 1,500 s.f. <br />whichever is more) <br />1,708 s.f. (20.0%, currently <br />17.9% or 1,528 s.f. exists) <br />Structures counted towards coverage: <br />Building footprint (1,392 s.f.) <br />- 1.5 ’ X 12’ two-stor>' bump-out on east side of house not illustrated on survey but <br />shown in pictures (18 s.f.) - a modification from the original sur\ ey. <br />- Deck entry from driveway to front door - (Section 10.03.14C (2) which states <br />“Tennis courts, patios, decks, and all similar “open ” structures...which extend <br />more than 6’ above grade level (if any portion of such structures extends more <br />than 6’ above grade level, the entire structure shall count toward lot coverage)” <br />(118 s.f). <br />- Proposed deck and staircase because both will be 6’ or higher above grade level <br />(180 s.f. is figured into the proposed structural coverage figure above). <br />Hardcover Calculations; <br />These figures include everything noted above that was counted towards structural <br />coverage. Also included are the retaining walls and driveway. The retaining walls were <br />added at the time of construction to ensure proper drainage and were not proposed with <br />the initial renewal variance review process. The driveway also appears larger than what <br />is depicted on the attached sur\ ey (see photo of driveway in Exhibit E). <br />Hardcover Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed <br />Zone Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover <br />0-75 3,668 s.f.Os.f 0 s.f.*Os.f. <br />(0%)(0 %)(0 %) <br />4 <br />• •