Laserfiche WebLink
M3-2907 <br />July 17.200J <br />Page 4 <br />Stnicturnl Coverage: <br />Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br />7,946 s.f.Allowed: 1500 s.f. <br />Existing: 1870 s.f. <br />Proposed: 1500 s.f. <br />Hardcover CalculaHom ; <br />Hardcover <br />Zone <br />Total Area in <br />Zone <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />0-75'3,600 s.f 0s.f. <br />(0 %) <br />1,058 s.f. <br />(29.4 %) <br />535 s.f. <br />(14.9%) <br />75-250*4,346 s.f 1,087 s.f. <br />(25 %) <br />2,257 s.f. <br />(51.9%) <br />1,961 s.f. <br />(45.1 %) <br />Total lot hardsurface proporid * 2,496 s.f. = 31 % of entire lot <br />Total lot hardsurface as a percent ol 75*250' zone = 2,496/4,346 » 57% <br />Hardship Statement <br />Applicants provided a hardship discussion in their submittal at the June meeting (see Exhibit D), <br />and should uc oSkcu for tlieir studiliouiil icsiimony regarding the application.odjvcu <br />Staff h^ not updated the Hardship Analysis (see June 12 memo). Planning Commission should <br />determine whether the variances required for this revised proposal arc supported by substantial <br />hardships in order for the variances to be granted. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1.The lot is extremely substandard and is smaller than all other lots in the immediate <br />neighborhood (see plat map). <br />2.Addition of second story at the existing side setbacks has a number of negative impacts and <br />potential consequences. <br />3.Are the reyis^ proposed reductions in structure and hardcover acceptable given the <br />extremely limited lot size? The structural coverage has been reduced to the 1500 s.f. <br />allotment for lots less than 1 0,000 s.f. in area, and hardcover appears to staff to be minimjyf^ <br />to the extent necessary to reasonably support the house at its current location:' <br />.V <br />4.Does Planning Commission have any other issues or concerns with this application?