Laserfiche WebLink
#03-2904 <br />June 11,2003 <br />Pnge3 <br />Staff would make the following recommendations in regards to the criteria for "undue hardship" <br />pertinent to this application: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />8. <br />"The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed <br />by the oflTicial controls.” <br />The property in question £sn be put to a reasonable use if the hardcover variance is not <br />granted The property contains an excess ofdriveway and retaining wall hardcover which <br />is not necessary for reasonable use of the property. Reasonable use of the property is a <br />single family residence with adequate vehicular and pedestrian access, which is perfectly <br />feasible without the need for a hardcover variance. <br />*The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by <br />the landowner.” <br />While the applicant is purchaser ofthe property and was not responsible for the hardcover <br />excesses, he was advised ofthe overa^is’S prior to his purchase of the property and he agreed <br />in writing (Exhibit F) to bring lU tn i:perty into hardcover compliance by June 1,2003. <br />The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.” <br />A visual comparison of this site with properties in the Minnetonka Bluffs neighborhood <br />suggests that the property has excessive hardcover as compared to most properties in the <br />neighborhood, and if this was the norm for the neighborhood, the character of the <br />neighborhood would be much different. <br />"Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for <br />the property exists under the terms of the 2^ning Chapter.” <br />"Extremefinancial and practical hardship " is cited by the applicant, noting that he requests <br />the variance in part in orderfor the property to "maintain its value ". The value associated <br />with non-compliant site features should not be legitimized by granting an after-the-fact <br />variance in a case where the purchaser was clearly aware ofthe non-compliance (ifnot the <br />actual degree of non-compliance) prior to the purchase and chose to tune the risk. <br />"Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for <br />solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined <br />in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter.” <br />(Not applicable) <br />"The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use <br />that is not permitted under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's <br />land is located.” <br />(Not applicable) <br />"The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelliitg.” <br />(Not Applicable) <br />"The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property.” <br />The special conditions applying to this property, i.e. the substandard lot si?e and limitations <br />on hardcover, as well as the topography of the site, are common to this neighborhood.