Laserfiche WebLink
Ml-2901 M4TMk*waRMd <br />May IS. 2M3 <br />Pagc3 <br />Hardcover Variance <br />Proposed hardcover in the 75-250' zone is 3,311 s.f. or 29.15%. The proposed house plan indicates <br />a 4'x 14* deck on the lakeside of the house. No elevation view of the lake side of the home has been <br />provided, so it is unknown whether additional decks, patios, patio doors or landings are <br />contemplated. The house is up against the 10* side setback on both sides. Minimal overhangs appear <br />to be shown, but the plan set provided is not to scale; overhangs must not encroach more than 1.5' <br />past the 10' side setback line. <br />The plans include a 3-stall side loading garage, the third stall of which could be eliminated to result <br />in a hardcover reduction of about 230 s.f. or 2.0% in the building and another 80 s.f (0.7%) in <br />driveway. The side-loading aspect has been accomplished on narrower (50') lots but results in tricky <br />maneuvering due to lack of backup depth. <br />Another way to reduce hardcover would be to re-orient the garage to be end loading, with a narrow <br />driveway extending to the 250' line, then construct a backup apron and perhaps even an additional <br />detached garage in the 75-250' zone where hardcover is available. This would require re-design of <br />the home, and applicant has stated an end-load garage would not provide the entrance view of the <br />home he is hoping to achieve by side-loading. However, with the same footprint as currently <br />proposed, a savings of about 200 s.f (1.8%) of hardcover could be realized. <br />Moving the proposed footprint 10' further from the lake could also reduce 80 s.f of hardcover in the <br />side-load configuration or about 150 s.f for an end-load layout. Applicant feels that views of the <br />lake are already somewhat reduced by the average setback variance granted to 684, and by applicant <br />moving the house back as far on the lot as currently proposed. <br />It is staff s opinion that a grading plan and site plan could be developed that would accommodate <br />a substantial new home on this property without the need for a hardcover variance. The hardship is <br />to a great e.xtent created by the applicant ’s desires for a certain size house in a specific location to <br />preserve lake views, rather than the nature of the property, in staffs opinion. Perhaps the location <br />of the house at 684 is a hardship in some respects. As lots get narrower, the design challenges <br />become greater. The City has granted hardcover variances for narrow or small lots where a <br />minimum size home cannot be constructed absent a variance. <br />Grading/Drainage <br />An initial grading and drainage plan was submitted within the past week The City Engineer’s <br />comments are attached as Exhibit E. His site inspection revealed serious concerns with the <br />proposed grading plan which need to be resolved before this application can move forward.