My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
06-09-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2023 4:13:58 PM
Creation date
2/8/2023 1:26:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
necessaryreHfninating the need for a conditional use permit. <br />Hardcover <br />0-75' setback zone <br />There exists 11,250 s.f. within the 0-75’ setback zone. Within this area, the existing retaining <br />walls, stairs and deck are 832 s.f. (7.4%). The applicant is proposing to reduce the hardcover to <br />524 s.f. (4.6%) within this setback zone. <br />The zoning ordinance allows for stairways of no more than 4’ in width and 32 s.f landings within <br />the shore setback zone on properties with major topographic changes towards the lake. The <br />applicants are proposing to rebuild the stairs with the necessary retaining walls down to the lake <br />so that they conform to the maximum 4’ width permitted with 32 s.f. landings, reducing <br />hardcover within the setback zone. The proposal meets the design criteria of the zoning <br />ordinance. <br />There is an existing 312 s.f. deck that is not proposed to change with this application. The deck is <br />nonconforming and in need of repair. <br />Bluff <br />Staff did not conduct a bluff analysis to determine if there is a bluff on the property. From a <br />review of the changes in topography on the lot, staff determined that there is a bluff and that the <br />proposed work is within the bluff impact zone. Removal and replacement of the existing steps <br />and retaining wall requires filling in a bluff impact zone where no filling is permitted. ITie <br />zoning ordinance does allow stairs and landings in the bluff impact zone. <br />Other Comments: <br />Building Official <br />The Building Official has recently inspected the existing deck within 75’ of the OHWL and <br />determined that it would require structural repairs. However, the deck is non-conforming and <br />such repairs would not be permitted without a variance. <br />City Engineer <br />The City Engineer has stated that the proposed plans lack information. The City Engineer <br />requests review of the following before proceeding with this proposal: <br />1. A detailed plan and profile design, including sections on either side of the stairway <br />and profile showing how plantings will screen the hardcover from the lakeside; <br />2. Calculations of the necessary' amount of excavation and fill for the project; and <br />3. A detailed erosion and sediment control plan. <br />Hardship: <br />The applicants have included their statement of hardship in Exhibit A. The applicants should also <br />be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. <br />Issues for Consideration: <br />^0}-2894 Douglas and Poban Smith <br />5/14/2003 <br />Page 3 of. <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.