My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
06-09-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2023 4:13:58 PM
Creation date
2/8/2023 1:26:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, April 21,2003 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(#1 1 #03-2889 RAVIA REAL ESTATE, LLC, Continued) <br />residential character of the buildings. The arched eyebrow and curved window feature of <br />the second story portions of the buildings also is a critical design element that enhances the <br />quality of these units. <br />Gaffron indicated that staff was satisfied that the building design was of a quality <br />appropriate for the proposed use, and should be a good fit uiii the senior housing to the <br />east. <br />In conclusion, Gaffron presented the Commission with 16 issues for discussion and site <br />planning issues a-k for consideration. He stated that it was staff’s opinion that, in general, <br />the office condo concept proposed was an appropriate and relatively low-intensity use of <br />this site as compared to other possible B-6 uses. Staff further believed the design of the <br />buildings were attractive and of a residential character. However, staff was concerned <br />about the parking needs, about potential traffic flow impacts to the adjacent commercial <br />use, and how this site would visually impact or be impacted by existing surrounding uses. <br />Gaffron indicated that staff also has concerns about the proposed road and parking lot <br />grades, and would suggest that the applicant submit a revised grading plan addressing the <br />City Engineer’s recommendations. <br />Mr. Alcon stated that the 13 units were designed similar to townhomes which would be <br />sold for office use. He mentioned that Ravia had two other developments in Burnsville <br />and at Saunders Lake North and South in Minnetrista for people to view a sample of their <br />work. <br />Alcon noted that Ravia had recently held two neighborhood meetings with the Sugarwoods <br />residents and the public in order to address any concerns in the community. He commented <br />that Bill Wear, owner of the neighboring strip mall, indicated that he would prefer a loop <br />access through Outlot D versus the straight driveway access from their development to his <br />center. While generally in agreement, Alcon stated that the loop would require construction <br />easements etc. He added that Mr. Wear also requested sidewalk access to his mall. During <br />the neighborhood meeting with 4 Sugarwood residents, Alcon indicated that there were <br />concerns with regard to buffers and access. <br />\\Tiile she was quite interested in viewing the landscape plan. Chair Smith asked if the <br />developer could salvage and reuse any of the existing u-ees on the site. <br />Alcon indicated that they would like to move several pines in the center of the property if <br />size permits. <br />Gaffron noted that most of the others would likely be removed. <br />PAGE 22 of 40
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.