My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
06-09-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2023 4:13:58 PM
Creation date
2/8/2023 1:26:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />1 <br />#03-2889 RiVia Rail Estate <br />June 5,2003 <br />Page 12 <br />Is the requested parking plan supported by data that demonstrates sufficiently that there will <br />not be . parking shortage once thi:> site is developed as proposed? Staff will review the gross <br />vs net area requirement with the City’s I'rafnc Engineer prior to Monday’s meeting... <br />Access driveways should be posted No Parking to avoid parking congestion. <br />6.Applicant should address the variety of concerns noted by the City Engineer: <br />Provide drainage calculations, drainage area map and storm sewer calculations <br />• Provide evidence that the downstream storm sewer has the capacity to serve the <br />proposed use. <br />Ad^ss potential runoff impacts to the adjoining property to the inunediate west <br />- The grade of the access road at the southeast end of the site is stilt an issue to be <br />resolved... <br />7.Does Council wish to consider the ramifleations of a full-time driveway connection to the <br />Orono Shopping Center site? This would require further review by City consultants to <br />determine whether this could be iq)proved or is advisable. An emergency connection only <br />is currently proposed. <br />8.Plans should be revised to provide for pedestrian access cormecting Orono Woods and the <br />office complex sidewalks, as well as a co.'tnecUon to the existing sidewalks abutting Hwy 12. <br />9. Plans should depict any existing vegetation that will remain as screening to the north; it is <br />critica. to fill in any gaps in existing vegetative screening between the north parking lot and <br />the Sugarwoods neighborhood. <br />10. Any other issues Council wishes to discuss... <br />IV. Planning Commission Recommendation <br />Planning Commission recommended approval per the staff recommendations as outlined in the staff <br />memo of May 16,2001, with the following additional recommendations: <br />1.Landscaping plans should include screening of the north-south retaining wall abutting the <br />adjoining property to the west, preferably with vines or similar vegetation based on the <br />minimal area available for plantings. <br />2.Any retail uses shall be ancillary to the ofhee use and shall encompass no more than 10% of <br />the gross floor area. <br />Applicants shall relocate trash enclosure if possible to be further firom the north property <br />boundary to reduce noise impacts to nei^boring residential uses, and shall attempt to ensure <br />trash pickup occurs during normal business hours, not during the night. <br />.M, <br />i <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.