Laserfiche WebLink
Request for Council Action continued <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />May 20. 2003 <br />Solicitors and Transient Merchants - Ordinance <br />Constitution. Solicitors of purely Minnesota-made products would appear eligible for licensing as <br />they would not be involved in interstate conunerce. However, other court cases indicate that to <br />require different requirements for different persons conducting essentially the same business amounts <br />to arbitrary, and thus unenforceable, regulation. <br />In addition, anyone who is going from place-to-place for the primary purpose of exercising his or <br />her general State or Federal Constitutional rights should not be licensed because, as with the <br />commerce clause, licensing imposes undue burdens on these constitutional rights. Most of the case <br />law related to this involves people who were exercising First Amendment rights by distributing <br />religious or political information and pamphlets. The fiict that a small fee or contribution may be <br />requested for the pamphlets has not been enough to remove these people ’s Constitutional <br />protections. <br />Licensing Peddlers and Transient Merchants <br />As a result of these court cases, it appears that the City may not regulate any solicitors. Since <br />business solicitors make their sales before obtaining their goods, interstate commerce could be <br />affected; and regulating contribution solicitation could interfere with First Amendment rights. <br />However, peddlers and transient merchants could be licensed because they have their goods in the <br />state and in-hand before they are sold, therefore having no impact on interstate commerce. <br />Although the City cannot license solicitors, the list of Prohibited Activities (Subd. 7 of proposed <br />ordinance) would be applicable to solicitors, as well as peddlers and transient merchants, and would <br />be enforceable by the Police Department. <br />Modified Green River Ordiimnces <br />A modified Green River ordinance, named for the city where it was first used and upheld, makes it <br />a trespass to enter onto any property, whether residential or not, for the purpose of soliciting or <br />peddling, where the property owner has posted a sign stating to the effect “No Peddlers or <br />Solicitors.” This applies everywhere a posting is made, is enforceable against all peddlers and <br />solicitois, including those involved in interstate commerce and those attempting to exercise <br />Constitutional rights, as the prohibition is actually made by the property owner or tenant and not a <br />governmental agency. This approach also allows for criminal prosecution of violators for <br />trespassing. This concept is part of the City’s current Code (Subd. 3-C) and will continue in the <br />proposed ordinance (Subd. 8 of the attached draft ordinance). <br />Summary of Proposed Changes <br />1 . Our current Code defines business solicitation and contribution solicitation, and treats their <br />licensing procedures differently. Since a recent U.S. Supreme Court case now prohibits even