My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-12-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
05-12-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2023 4:13:10 PM
Creation date
2/8/2023 9:13:57 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
282
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The upper level new deck/patio door is over hardcover, therefore does not increase the amount of <br />hardcover. <br />Cantilevered walls: <br />The cantilevered wall on the north side to the bedroom addition (Lakeside) is new and not over <br />hardcover, therefore the amount of hardcover has a net increase of 32 s.f. <br />The cantilevered wall on the street side of the kitchen addition is under the eave, therefore will <br />not increase the amount of hardcover. <br />Lot Coverage by Stractures: <br />The subject property is 26,616.8 s.f. in size and is allowed 4,142.4 s.f of lot coverage by <br />structures. Currently, the property has 2,578 s.f (9.3%) of lot coverage by structures. The <br />proposed additions and lake side deck increase the amount to 3,572.8 s.f (12.9%). <br />Foundation: <br />The applicant ’s builder, Tom Bricko, checked the foundation prior to submittal of the proposed <br />addition plans to assure the foundation could handle the additional load of another story above it. <br />Initially, it appeared to be sound. Building Inspector, Bruce Vang, visited the site and had some <br />concerns regarding the foundation and if frost footings existed. Staff forwarded those concerns <br />to the applicant ’s builder. The builder then dug down 4 '/i’ to verify if there were frost footings. <br />There were no frost footings. The existing foundation will be removed and a new one <br />constructed. <br />The set of plans of which this report was written indicate the existing foundation will be <br />removed, however the new foundation has slightly increased in size. The increase is <br />approximately 20 s.f <br />Average Lakeshore Setback: <br />A portion of the proposed addition on the north side of the residence, all of the proposed <br />additions to the south side, and the cantilevered wall on the lakeside of the residence lie within <br />the average lakeshore setback. <br />The property to the south, 2967 Casco Point Road, had a main residence and caretaker’s house <br />on it until 1977. In 1977, the caretaker’s house was subdivided off from the property. The <br />property with the caretaker’s house is addressed 2965 Casco Point Road. When the property at <br />2965 Casco Point Road was subdivided off, it became unusually shaped and significantly <br />chat.ged the average lakeshore setback for the two adjacent propenies. (See survey). <br />/t03-2881 Cuitis4CathIeen Midthun <br />2941 Casco Point Road <br />4/18/2003 <br />Page 4 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.