My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-28-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
04-28-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2023 4:12:48 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 3:41:29 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
493
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning <br />Conunission held a public hearing on April 21,2003, at which time all persons desiring to he heard <br />concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. <br />Minnesota: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono. <br />FINDINGS <br />This application was reviewed as Zoning File #03-2887. <br />The property is located in the LR-IB Zoning District, where 1 acre is the minimum <br />required lot area. The property consists of approximately 0.19 acres. <br />The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 21, 2003 <br />and recommended partial conditional approval by a vote of 7 to 0. <br />4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br />A. The lot was platted in 1888, prior to the adoption of the current zoning <br />ordinance and requirements for blufl's; <br />B. The 8,172 s.f. (0.19 acre) iot with a 50' width does not meet the minimum lot <br />area (43,560 s.f. or 1 acre) nor lot width (140’) requirements for the district; <br />C. The property contains an existing home and detached garage; <br />D. Due to the size of the lot, it would be dilTicult to construct a home meeting all <br />setback requirements or that did not exceed the required hardcover in the 75’ <br />to 250’ setback zone; <br />E. The existing detached garage and concrete driveway pad located within <br />Hennepin County's right of way will be removed with this application; <br />F. Completely avoiding impacts to the bluff would severely limit the size of the <br />house on the lot. The proposal minimally impacts the bluff; and <br />G. There is no hardship to support the proposed 10' setback from the side lot line <br />or structural coverage in excess of 1.500 s.f. Therefore, the proposed home <br />must be located no closer than the required lO'setback from the side lot lines <br />and should be limited to no more than 1,500 s.f of lot coverage. <br />Page 2 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.