Laserfiche WebLink
Structure within 75’ of Lake Minnetonka: <br />A portion of the existing residence is located within the 75’ setback from Lake Minnetonka. <br />At the closest point it is 64’ u me OIIWL of Lake Miiuieiuiika. The second story addition <br />will also be above this portion of the residence. Also, a small portion of the proposed screen <br />porch is located within the 75’ setback from the lake. <br />Hardcover: <br />0-75’ setback aone - <br />A portion of the existing residence is located within the 0-75’ setback zone. The second story <br />addition/dormers are located v/ithin this setback zone. The haidcover will not increase <br />with the addition. To decrease the amount of hardcover in this zone, the applicant has agreed <br />to the removal of the concrete shuffleboard. the brick next to the shuffleboard surface and half <br />of the patio located by the residence. These removals reduce the amount of hardcover in this <br />setback zone to 1,215 s.f. (10%) from 1,730 s.f. (14.3%). <br />75-250’ setback zonc- <br />The rest of the existing residence, garage and driveway are located in the 75-250’ setback <br />zone. Currently, there exists 10,254 s.f. (37%) hardcover in t.he setback zone. The applicant <br />is proposing to remove the brick apron, some of the sidewalk pa\'ers, a deck, and a gravel area <br />by the driveway. These removals reduce the amount of hardcover in this setback zone to <br />9,092 s.f. (33%). <br />The driveway on this property is fairly extensive and accounts for a large amount of <br />hardcover. Because the lot is long and it would be difficult to back out onto Tonkawa Road, a <br />circle in the driveway is appropriate. Because this residence is on Tonkawa Road, there is a <br />fair amount of traffic and difficult sight lines, it is important to have a turn around on the <br />property so the homeowner can drive straigh. onto Tonkawa Road rather than backing out. <br />The applicant has agreed to remove portions of the existing driveway, while leaving <br />enough to still be functional. <br />Average Lakeshore Setback: <br />The existing residence is located 17’ into the average lakeshore setback. The second story <br />addition/dorniers will not change the location or encroachment in the setback. The existing <br />topography, the layout of the neighboiing houses and existing vegetation screening all suggest <br />that the proposed addition will not be within the visibility of either neighboring property and <br />will not encroach on any existing view ot the lake. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION: <br />The Planning Commission recommended by a 5 to 0 vote to: <br />Approve the proposed plan with the following conditions: <br />1 . Screen porch and deck approved as proposed. <br />2. Ground level patio (lakeside) to be reduced to half the current size. (Remove 128 s.f.) <br />3. If the foundation in the 0-75 should need repairs the project will come back to the Planning <br />Commission for further review'.I