My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-24-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
03-24-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 3:09:24 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 2:59:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#01-2714 -1340 Baldur Park Rd. <br />March 19,2003 <br />Page 3 <br />available, the issue remains as to whether the sewer construction would be a private project <br />involving both Franklin and Puzak, or whether it would be completed and assessed as a public <br />project. <br />Another alternative would be to allow construction of the 5-bedroom home connected to the 3- <br />bedroom septic system, and require that the house be connected to sewer as soon as it becomes <br />available. The obvious risk is that this or a subsequent owner might overuse the system and cause <br />it to fail. <br />The variances granted on November 13,2001 expired on November 13,2002 because no permit was <br />applied for nor obtained before the expiration date. The City notified applicant twice in writing of <br />the expiration date and the need to sign the resolution copies to validate them before building permits <br />could be issued. Applicant never signed the resolutions. From staffs perspective, despite <br />applicant’s ongoing discussions with Paul Weinberger, the variances have technically expired and <br />a new application must be processed. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Provide direction to applicant and staff regarding the following: <br />1. Should applicant be allowed to construct a new home without connection to municipal <br />sewer? <br />2. If so, should the house be reduced in size from S-bedrooms to 3-bedrooms to match the <br />design capacity of the septic system? <br />3. Is there any basis to allow variance renewal without going through the formal review <br />process?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.