03-24-2003 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

#01-2714 • 1340 Baldur Park Rd. March 19, 2003 Page 2 include: 1. 2. City has been unable to obtain proper sewer easement from Rill Franklin. The status of the easement is as follows: Mr. & Mrs. Franklin signed an easement document in late 2001, which the City staff forwarded to the City Attorney for filing. Afier obtaining Franklin’s Certificates of Title, the Attorney in April 2002 concluded that the easement could not be filed without minor language revisions documenting the Franklins’ marital status. Greg Gappa subsequently sent a revised casement document to Franklin on August 8, 2002. Franklin never returned it. Gappa sent out a second copy on November 8,2002, w hich has never been returned. These never w ere returned to the City by the Pest Office, so w e must conclude that Franklin received them. In January 2003 Gappa then attempted to file the casement which the City Attorney had rejected, and the County Registrar would not accept it because the Franklins’ signatures were in black ink and could not be confirmed as original. Construction of new septic system last fall. Last fall the applicant had a contractor install a new septic system to serve the existing residence. City Inspector Matt Bolterman confimicd that the new' system has design capacity for only a 3-bcdroom home, and that there was not room on the site to construct primary and alternate systems for a 5-bcdroom home as was proposed and approved in Resolution No. 4720. It appears that both conditions a) and b) have come to pass, since the applicant can’t comicct to sewer absent an ca.semcnt, and construction of a new home to be connected to a septic system is inconsistent with the conditions of approval noted in the resolution. Applicant’s Request 1 he applicant requests that the variances be renew ed but with removal of the condition requiring connection to sewer. This request first came to staff in late October 2002 but followup was delayed due to Paul Weinberger’s leaving. It is staffs conclusion that a formal variance renewal application is necessary, but the request for changes to the conditions of approval suggests a review by Council is warranted as “old business for discussion prior to processing a formal renewal application. SlafT Kcrummendation .Staff recommends that applicant be advised to 1) redesign the house to a 3-bedroom configuration, and 2) to make a new (not renewal) variance application for a revised house plan and connection to the existing 3-bcdroom capacity septic system rather than to City sewer. As an alternative, to preserve his 5-bedroom design, staffsuggested to applicant that he might again request that the City condemn an easement for sewer. Staff is requesting Council direction as to w hether there is any support for proceeding w ith a condemnation. Once an casement becomes