My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-10-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
02-10-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 2:08:30 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:58:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r:- <br />was to add a second story. A structural engineer visited the property and determined the existing <br />foundation could not bear more weight without being replaced. The applicant got an estimate to <br />replace it under the residence and decided to only add a second story over the garage. <br />The applicant is proposing to remove the existing garage and construct a new two stall attached <br />garage with a second story. Also, the garage will be enlarged an additional 78 s.f. as indicated <br />on Exhibit D. <br />Rear Vard/Sidc Yard Adjacent Street Setbacks: <br />Rear- The existing and proposed garage location remains the same, 4.5 ’ from the rear property <br />line. The zoning district requires 50’. Because this is technically a comer lot, the north lot line is <br />by definition the rear. <br />Side Yard Adjacent Street- The proposed garage will be located 14 ’ rather then the existing 15’ <br />from the side property line adjacent to the street. The zoning district requires 50’. <br />The property is located in a two acre zoning district. However, the neighborhood is more in <br />character with half acre zoning standards. If half acre zoning standards were applied to this <br />property the existing residence would come close to meeting the 15’ required side yard adjacent <br />street setback. However, the rear yard setback in the half acre district is 30 ’ and the rear setback <br />is remaining at 4.5 ’ in this proposal. <br />Lot Coverage by Structures: <br />The property is less than 10,000 s.f., therefore it is allowed 1,500 s.f of lot coverage by <br />structures. The existing residence is 1,332 s.f The construction of the garage and 78 s.f of <br />e.xpansion is proposed to be 1,410 s.f It is below the allowed 1,500 s.f so a lot coverage by <br />stmeture variance is NOT required. <br />Hardcover: <br />The subject property falls in two hardcover zones, 75-250’ and 250-500’. The construction of <br />the garage is located in the 250-500’ setback zone. Currently there is 600 s.f of area in the 75- <br />250’ setback zone and no hardcover. Even though the proposed hardcover in the 250-500’ <br />setback zone is 2,391 (36.5%) over the allowed 1,963.5 s.f. (30%), the applicant has not used all <br />of the 600 s.f. in the 75-250’ setback zone. The City does allow credit for unused hardcover <br />allotment to be transferred to zones further from the lake. This is referred to as transfer of <br />hardcover allotments from zone to zone. Even with the transfer of hardcover, the amount of <br />hardcover is still over the allowed amount. And the amount of hardcover from existing to <br />proposed is increasing by 78 s.f There are areas on the property such as patio and driveway <br />where hardcover could be removed to remain at existing levels. <br />t <br />^02-2S62 Steven Cronwall <br />1 586 Long Lake Blvd. <br />1/15/2003 <br />Page 2 of3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.