Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 27,2003 <br />7:00 o*clock p.m. <br />(#02-2789/02-2840 DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT LLC, Continued) <br />Johnston stated that the developer could obtain a 20’ setback without turning the buildings, <br />however, they would lose the ability to offer three car garages and the garage doors would <br />face the road. By asking for a 10 ’ setback, Johnston stated that they could retain these <br />things, and he didn ’t believe there was a significant difference between a 330 ’ versus a <br />340 ’ buffer setback from Willow View. He reported that the wetland fill required for the <br />project had been reduced by 4/10 of an acre. <br />White asked how the wetlands would be marked, in order to protect the wetlands during <br />construction. <br />Gaffron slated that the City would expect silt fencing along the buffer areas and that all the <br />workers would be familiar with the delineation. <br />Johnston concurred, stating that the development would be surveyed w ithin the delineation <br />and silt fencing installed. <br />Sansevere arrived at 8:03 P.M. <br />Although conversations with MCWD have been favorable, Murphy reminded everyone <br />that buffer issues are critical to them. <br />Johnston stated that, while Orono requires 26’ buffers, MCWD buffers often vary 10-40'. <br />He indicated that, obviously, there would be no buffer where fill was required, however, <br />the nortlieast buffer area had been connected requiring the widest buffer zone. <br />White stated that the wetland delineation has proven a difficult task and he was glad to see <br />the issues were nearly resolved. <br />Murphy reminded the developer that, while staff is going along with this, if the MCWD <br />board doesn ’t support their proposal, there is not much the City can do. <br />W'ith regard to the General Development Plan Approval condition number 2, Gaffron <br />reported that Mr. Dahlstrom had agreed to the required development fees. <br />In reference to the aflbrdable housing contribution, Gaffron indicated that Mr. Dahlstrom <br />would prefer that an affordable housing program already existed here. While he supported <br />the concept, Dahlstrom had reserv ations about supporting or pledging money to something <br />that doesn ’t exist currently. <br />Moorse stated that the City’s commitment would be to hold an affordable housing <br />workshop to attempt to put together a housing program. <br />PAGE 10 of 28 <br />!