Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 27,2003 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(I^02-2789/02-2840 DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT LLC, Continued) <br />an additional level of comfort with granting the approvals requested. <br />Finally, Gaffron explained tha* the applicant has requested a temporary sales office trailer <br />be located on the commercial outlot at 12/Willow for approximately I year until model <br />units are available or it can be moved into the site north of Kelley Parkway. <br />Once again, Gaffron noted that, based on the fact that the majority of the pending issues <br />have been resolved or arc expected to be resolved, and based on the inclusions of various <br />disclaimers, caveats, and waivers already discussed and appearing in the Resolution, staff <br />recommends adoption of the proposed “Resolution Granting Preliminaiy Plat Approval <br />and General Development Plan Approval for Planned Unit Development No. 4' subject to <br />rny additional conditions Council feels are appropriate. <br />While there were four things that MCWD was comfortable with. Gaffron was unsure <br />whether they would support the wetland buffer impacts and variances. Since the wetlands <br />have been defined and accepted by MCWD, as indicated earlier, this has affected the <br />layout of the northerly parcels, thus, requiring minimal structural impacts where comers of <br />buildings abut the buffer zones and setbacks. He noted that staff is comfortable with <br />granting these variances. <br />Mayor Peterson asked whether staff was comfortable with the reduction of on-street <br />parking spaces. <br />As each unit offers 2-3 stalls of parking on-site, Gaffron did not feel the reduction would <br />have a large impact on parking overall. Adding that the developer had substantially met the <br />standard, Gaffron asked if Couneil would like to require additional parking. <br />Murphy felt the reduction was caused by the new wetland delineation and did not feel <br />additional parking was warranted. <br />Steve Johnston, ol Landforms Fngincering, pointed out that the need for variances was <br />necessary atkr the MCWD connected several small wetlands. By connecting these smaller <br />wetlands, MCWD made it virtually impossible to avoid the wetland area altogether, thus <br />requiring variances to allow one unit 10* away from the property line. He maintained that <br />the homes would still be 330* away Iroin the nearest house thru a natural buffer. Johnston <br />also noted that the developer would prefer to keep the garages on the sides to improve the <br />street side approach aesthetically. <br />Murphy asked if the natural buffer w as a buildahle site. <br />Gaffron pointed out that the land would not be built on since it was created spcctfically as <br />a buffer outlot for W'illow View. <br />PAGE 9 of 28 <br />____