My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-20-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
09-20-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:30:21 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:27:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO FLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Moaday, Aafvst 16,2084 <br />6:00 o*dock p.m. <br />((NM-3046 Robert and Breads MacDoaald, coatiaaed) <br />MacDonald suted he would prefer lo ha\x an amount that the hardco\*er should be reduced b>' and that <br />he would like to decide where he could reduce it. <br />Bremer stated this lot encompasses a number of different zones gi\*en the size of the lot and that she <br />w ould prefer reducing the hardcover in the 75' • 250' zone. <br />Gundlach illustrated on the overhead the 75’ - 250' zone where the hardcover should be removed. <br />MacDonald inquired whether he could look at his options for reducing the hardcover and come back <br />before the Planning Commission. <br />Raha amended his previous OMlioB, Bremer seconded, to recommend approval of <br />Applkallon d04-30M, approval of an aner-the-fact side yard setback variance lo permit the <br />detached garage to remain 8.4 feet from the side lot line when 10 feel is normally required, with <br />the coaditioa that 800 square feet of hardcover be removed in the 75' - 250* zone for the <br />property located at 2480 Old Beach Road. VOTE: Ayes 6, .Nays 0. <br />PIJ^NMNG COM.MIS.SION CO.MMF.NTS <br />»10. REPORT OF PLA.NMNG CO.M.MISSION REPRESENTATIVES AITENDING <br />COUNCIL MEETINGS JULY 26. 2004 AND Al'Gl ST 9, 2004. <br />Fntzlcr indicated he attended the July 26 meeting and noted that the bowling alley application was <br />approved with a larger garage. <br />Gundlach indicated the Planning Commission had recommended ten feet and the Council allowed <br />12' with a 22’ wide garage. <br />Jurgens stated he attended the August 9 meeting, noting that the James Brooks application was put on <br />the consent agenda. Jurgens indicated that approval for a sign for the medical building at the comer of <br />Highway 12 and Kelley Parkway was before the City Council, which did not appear before the <br />PLnning Commission. <br />Jurgens noted he also requested a joint w ork session w ith the Council. <br />White indicated the Council met w ith Shardlow . w ho had given them a synopsis of the issues to be <br />discussed in defining the future of a city. <br />Jurgens requested the Planning Commission be included in those discussions. <br />Jurgens indicated the Council at the .August 9* meeting did discuss the appearance of the roof on the <br />monument sign for the new medical buildmg as well <br />Leslie inquired whether that was the sign that actually brought on the new sign ordinance. <br />PAGE 25 <br />I <br />J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.