My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-20-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
09-20-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:30:21 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:27:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTflS OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Moaday, Aacuit 16,2004 <br />6:00 o*clock p.m. <br />(404*3046 Robert aad Breada MacDoaald, coatiaacd) <br />the hardcover, but it was not the sole issue. MacDonald indicated other issues, such as sewer and <br />water hookups, in his nund made the project not worth pursuing and he decided to remodel the garage <br />instead. MacDonald stated he elected to remodel <lie garage because it looked awful and was <br />falling down. <br />MacDonald indicated he is willing to discuss the hardcover, but indicated he does not feel it is the <br />issue at the present time. MacDonald stated the issue in his mind is whether the structure is <br />conforming to allow him to obtain a variance for the 18 inches. MacDonald commented he would <br />prefer to be able to retain the parking lot in order to accommodate guests and not have them park in <br />mud or in the grass. <br />Fntzler inquired who w as responsible for the remodeling of the garage. <br />MacDonald stated his caretaker w'as in charge of the project while he was in Honda, but that he <br />ultimately takes responsibility for the project. MacDonald stated his intention was to be within what <br />the City was asking for w hen he w anted to originally rebuild the garage. <br />Kempf inquired what the large expanse of hardcover leading to a gate is used for. <br />MacDonald stated that area is utilized by guests for parking. MacDonald noted that area was also <br />discussed as a possibility for loss of hardcover when the larger garage was being considered. <br />Kempf commented the turnaround appears to be large enough to allow for some parking of cars. <br />.MacDonald indicated there are some options regarding a reduction in hardcover, but noted that the <br />main issue in his other application was the sewer and electrical hookups and not the excessive <br />hardcover. MacDonald indicated a considerable amount of grading would need to be done in order to <br />provide bathroom facilities in the garage, and combined with the other issues, he decided nut to pursue <br />that project. MacDonald stated reducing the width of the driveway by one foot was discussed at that <br />time, but It was just one small piece that was discussed dunng his previous application. <br />Bremer inquired if there is a retroactive dale in the statute. <br />Kelley stated it went into effective August I". <br />Bremer inquired whether the statute applies to construction that occurs prior to the date of <br />construction. <br />Kelley stated it is his opinion the City has the discretion to decide w'hcthcr to anaK'ze it under the old <br />law or the new law. <br />Bremer inquired w hether at the time of construction the applicant was in compliance with city <br />ordinances. <br />Kelley suted at the lime this garage was constructed, city code and state stanitc provided that a person <br />PAGE 21
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.