My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-15-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
11-15-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:26:30 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:21:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
341
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO M*ANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MoM4ay, October It, 2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(004.3063 WJM Propcrtlet. Cootiooed) <br />Leslie noted a lengthy period of time has been spent trying to addreu the issues on this site, but that 'k <br />personally does not feel that enough infomution has b^ supplied. Leslie stated if the true intent of <br />the lighting u secunty, a fence coupled by perimeter lighting, leaving the center darker, might be a <br />way of preventing mtrusion but would sull restnet the total ambient light from being as great as it is <br />un^ the proposed plan. Leslie stated he would be willing to discuss this in detail at the next Planning <br />Commission work session so the applicant can mos-e forw ard <br />Gaffron noted the next w ork session is scheduled for November 3*^. <br />Rahn indicated he is in agreement with Leslie and that a more detailed study needs to be submitted. <br />Winkey inquired whether other options for secunty have been discussed for this property outside of <br />lighting. <br />Johnson sttied the primary reason for the fence is not for secunty but is there to help screen the <br />parking lot. Johnson stat^ the pnmary reason for the additioiul lighting is to provide protection for <br />the property as well as the personnel that will be on the site. Johnson stated he is not prepared at this <br />time to discuss other possible secunty measures that could be token <br />Lcsttr moved, Kempr sccomled, lo tabic AppHcaltoa #64-3063, WJM Propenies, LLC, 2605 <br />West Wayzala Boulevard, for a coadHioaal use permit ameadmeni, bat to recommend granting <br />of the extension of the dcadiines for constmetion of the approved site to l>eccmber 31,2005. <br />Gaffron inquired w hether this matter w as being tabled to the work session. <br />Bremer stated it is. <br />Leslie inquired whether the Planmng Commission would be able to approw it at the wixk session. <br />Gafh^on indicated because it has been publicly noted at tonight’s meeting and this maner is basically <br />being adjourned to the work session, that they could approve it at that time if the issues are resolved. <br />VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0 <br />(Recess token fram 9:20 lo 9:2S p.m.) <br />10. 604-3062 JOHN TERRANCE HOMES, LLC, 26XX KELLEY PARKWAY (OUTLOT <br />E, STONEBAY) - RNAL PLAT AND PUD SITE PLAN A.MENDMC.NT, !«:21 - I0J2 p.m. <br />Steve Johnston. John Tcirance Homes; Pete Villard, Architect; and John Hassler. John Terrance <br />Homes, w ere present <br />PAGE 34 <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.