Laserfiche WebLink
MLNtTES OF THE <br />ORONO FiJiNMNG COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October IB, 2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(Bill and Robia GricrMB, Coatlaued) <br />Leslie staled one of (Hr questions in Suff s report is whether there is a hardship associated w ith the <br />fact that this property has lakeshore on tw o sides. Leslie stated if it is assumed that the lake w as not <br />on the front side of the house and that this w*as a single lakeshore property, w hat effectively w ould <br />happen is the 0-7S' west would stay as is and the 0-7S* east would become a part of the 7S'-250’ zone. <br />Leslie pointed out under that scenano the allowed hardcover would be 0 percent in the 0-75’ west, <br />1.346 feet in the 0-75 east now reclassified as 75-250’, and 1.190 in the 75 ’-250’. which allow s for a <br />toul of 2,536. Leslie noted the current hardcover is 4.232. which is substantially over the amount that <br />w ould be allowed. <br />Leslie inquired if this property w as any other lakeshore property, w hether an expansion of the <br />footpnnt would be allow^. <br />Jurgens stated in his view the hardcover does seem to be excessive, and inquired whether the <br />applicants have explored the option of adding onto the front of the hou.se. <br />Hansen indicated the client would prefer not to add onto the front of the house to minimize the impact <br />on the neighbors. <br />Curtis sta.cd an addition off the front would also encroach on the side yard setback, w hich is currently <br />conforming at ten feet. <br />Gnerson indicated she is not interested in adding to the front of the house due to the impact on the <br />neighbors. Grierson stated if the addition w ere constructed in the back, it w ould not impact any of the <br />neighbors. <br />Fntzler stated the proposed 51 percent is excessive in his view and that he w ould like to sec the size of <br />the addition reduced along w ith removal of the patio paxers. <br />Gnerson stated the home is unique given the fact that it is 100 years old, but that there arc also a <br />number of inadequacies with the structure Gnerson indicated they hax'e spoken to a number of <br />builders who have suggested tearing down the structure and constructing new. Grierson stated she <br />w ould like to retain the character of the cunent residence but make it more efficient for today’s w orld. <br />Fntzler inquired w hether the height of the garage w ould be raised. <br />Gnerson indicated she does not believe so <br />Hansen stated some bigger floor trusses would be installed in the garage. <br />Fritzler noted currently the garage does not have an 8-foot door. <br />Hansen stated it is a 7-foot garage door. <br />PAGE 28